Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6709

Bill Overview

Title: Improving Mental Health in Schools Act

Description: This bill includes certain mental health professionals as specialized instructional support personnel for purposes of elementary and secondary education. Specifically, the bill revises the definition of specialized instructional support personnel in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to include qualified mental health professionals involved in providing mental health services for students. These professionals include, among others, marriage and family therapists, licensed clinical social workers, and clinical psychologists.

Sponsors: Rep. Harder, Josh [D-CA-10]

Target Audience

Population: Students and educational staff who will benefit from enhanced mental health support in schools

Estimated Size: 50450000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

High School Student (New York, NY)

Age: 16 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm really anxious about college and could use someone to talk to.
  • Having someone familiar with mental health at school would make it easier to get help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 6

Middle School Teacher (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having mental health professionals on campus could help my students focus better.
  • It might also relieve some pressure from teachers to act as counselors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

School Principal (Chicago, IL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Mental health is a serious need and we lack the resources to address it.
  • This policy could help us offer better support to our students.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Licensed Clinical Social Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being included as specialized instructional support means new job opportunities within schools.
  • This policy could lead to a more integrated approach to student health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

High School Student (Rural Kentucky)

Age: 17 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There aren't any specialists in my area to talk to, even if I wanted to.
  • If these services were at school, I'd definitely use them.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

Parent and PTA member (Miami, FL)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My child struggles with focus and could benefit from specialized support.
  • Having a therapist at school would be a game changer for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Journalist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 30 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a significant step forward in recognizing the importance of mental health.
  • The challenge will be in effective implementation within budget constraints.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

School counselor (Seattle, WA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Additional mental health staff would provide students with needed support.
  • This would alleviate some of my own workload, allowing me to better focus on students in need.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Government official (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Allocating resources efficiently is crucial for this policy to succeed.
  • There needs to be accountability and evaluation mechanisms to assess impact.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

High School Student (Detroit, MI)

Age: 15 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I often feel alone dealing with my problems.
  • If there were someone at school to talk to, things might not seem so overwhelming.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 2: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 3: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 5: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 10: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Year 100: $2000000000 (Low: $1500000000, High: $2500000000)

Key Considerations