Bill Overview
Title: To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds relating to the Climate Change Professionals Program and any other program, project, or activity relating to climate change of the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.
Description: This bill prohibits the Department of Homeland Security from using funds to carry out the Climate Change Professionals Program or any other program, project, or activity relating to climate change.
Sponsors: Rep. Perry, Scott [R-PA-10]
Target Audience
Population: People globally affected by climate change
Estimated Size: 331000000
- The Climate Change Professionals Program and other related programs likely involve professionals working on climate-related issues.
- These programs may create policies and implement measures to adapt to or mitigate the effects of climate change, benefiting people globally.
- Climate change is a global issue affecting populations worldwide through sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and other phenomena.
- The effectiveness of the Department of Homeland Security's climate programs could indirectly impact populations by enhancing national resilience to these climate impacts.
Reasoning
- The Climate Change Professionals Program is aimed at addressing climate-related issues such as disaster preparedness and national security, which should be reflected in the impact on individuals.
- Generally, those working in climate change programs, people in disaster-prone areas, and younger generations may feel the greatest impact of this policy.
- The policy's impact could be limited for those not directly involved in such programs or not in disaster-prone areas.
- The program's current budget allows for significant operations, so its cancellation could affect many professionals and communities.
- Most people in the U.S. (331 million) could potentially benefit from climate-related projects through enhanced safety and preparedness, but direct impacts may vary widely.
Simulated Interviews
Disaster Preparedness Coordinator (Miami, FL)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could severely impact our work, leaving communities less prepared for hurricanes.
- Funding cuts mean fewer resources for training and infrastructure.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 3 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 2 | 8 |
Environmental Scientist (New Orleans, LA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Research projects may be jeopardized, impacting community resilience studies.
- This policy hinders progress toward sustainable solutions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 4 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 9 |
Graduate Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 24 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Cuts to climate programs reduce career prospects and research opportunities.
- Concerned about future job stability in government roles.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 9 |
Small Business Owner (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Neutral on federal programs, but values ecological sustainability for business.
- Would prefer stronger climate action but focused on local efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retired Engineer (Dallas, TX)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm skeptical about the value of such government programs, so this change doesn't bother me much.
- I believe local initiatives could be more effective.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Environmental Activist (New York, NY)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a step back in the fight against climate change.
- I'm worried about losing momentum in environmental protection efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 3 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 3 | 9 |
| Year 10 | 2 | 9 |
| Year 20 | 2 | 9 |
Film Producer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While my work is not dependent on this specific funding, reduced national efforts might hinder broader awareness campaigns.
- Continued education is crucial but will need more private support.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 7 |
Oil and Gas Industry Worker (Houston, TX)
Age: 36 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- While the policy may cut federal support, industry changes seem inevitable.
- I'm more concerned with how private sectors adapt to clean energy trends.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 9 |
School Teacher (Chicago, IL)
Age: 52 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could affect educational content and student engagement.
- I'd like to see continued support for climate awareness in schools.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 8 |
Tech Entrepreneur (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Federal support is essential for developing scalable clean technology.
- This policy could slow innovation and collaboration.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $115000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $130000000)
Year 2: $118450000 (Low: $103000000, High: $133300000)
Year 3: $122000000 (Low: $106000000, High: $136600000)
Year 5: $129300000 (Low: $112500000, High: $144700000)
Year 10: $145800000 (Low: $126700000, High: $163900000)
Year 100: $371900000 (Low: $322500000, High: $418000000)
Key Considerations
- Immediate savings due to cessation of funds to existing programs.
- Potential long-term economic impact due to reduced climate resilience.
- Impact on national security and disaster response capabilities related to climate-related threats may arise.
- Effect on federal and local partnerships that were part of DHS climate initiatives.