Bill Overview
Title: STOP CCP Act
Description: This bill imposes visa- and property-blocking sanctions on any person who is or was a member of any National Communist Party Congress of China, as well as any adult family member of such a person. The President may waive the sanctions for renewable periods of 30 days by certifying to Congress that China's government and the Chinese Communist Party have ceased (1) any acts of genocide against the Uyghur Muslim population; (2) all threats, military exercises, and aggression toward Taiwan; (3) undermining the autonomy of Hong Kong; and (4) any efforts to steal the intellectual property of U.S. persons. The certification must also be publicly available on a federal government website.
Sponsors: Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-10]
Target Audience
Population: People who are current/former members of the National Communist Party Congress of China and their adult family members
Estimated Size: 5000
- The bill targets individuals who are current or former members of the National Communist Party Congress of China, which constitutes a large and significant political group within China.
- The sanctions extend not only to the individuals directly involved in CCP leadership but also to their adult family members, increasing the reach of the bill's impact.
- Aside from direct members, this bill would affect many individuals who have familial ties to involved members, potentially affecting thousands or even millions of individuals due to the extended nature of many Chinese families.
- The restrictions pertain to visa and property rights, which may have implications on foreign travel, foreign real estate investments, and international mobility for the affected group.
Reasoning
- The STOP CCP Act mainly targets individuals directly and indirectly related to the National Communist Party Congress of China with visa and property sanctions. Thus, the majority impact will be seen in Chinese nationals rather than U.S. citizens, except for those with direct familial ties who might experience some financial or emotional stress.
- U.S. citizens, especially those of Chinese descent, might face indirect effects such as strained familial relations or concerns over properties owned by their families in the U.S. However, only a small minority would directly feel the financial implications.
- Most Americans would not experience any noticeable change in their daily lives as this policy doesn't target the domestic economic or social structure significantly.
- The policy's financial budget primarily focuses on implementing sanctions rather than direct citizen support or welfare, hence, minimal direct impact on general well-being for typical U.S. citizens.
Simulated Interviews
Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think it's important to address human rights issues, but I worry about the effects on my family still in China.
- This policy might complicate my plans to visit China to see my parents.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 8 |
Graduate Student (New York, NY)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This might affect my future job prospects if it's considered controversial to have ties to China.
- I am concerned about the political tension this might cause.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Business Owner (Houston, TX)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy may complicate my business operations and affect my partners in China.
- I am worried about long-term implications on trade.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Research Scientist (Chicago, IL)
Age: 25 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think being tough on these issues is necessary, but sanctions might not be the best tool.
- I'm more concerned about scientific collaboration impacts than personal ones.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Retired (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 68 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I understand why the government is doing this, but I feel removed from it.
- My main concern is how this will affect perceptions of Chinese-Americans.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Journalist (Seattle, WA)
Age: 39 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a complex geopolitical maneuver.
- Public understanding of why this is important is crucial.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Professor (Boston, MA)
Age: 47 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am concerned about academic relations between U.S. and China.
- Policies like this put extra pressure on international students.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Policy Analyst (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy represents a significant ideological stance.
- It's crucial to balance diplomatic tensions with effective measures.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Financial Advisor (Miami, FL)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Client concerns over investments could rise due to this policy.
- I anticipate more stress in explaining these changes to my clients.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Retired Military Officer (Portland, OR)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm supportive of strong measures to protect national interests.
- I hope this doesn't escalate further.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 3: $10000000 (Low: $8000000, High: $12000000)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- Potential diplomatic and economic response from China, including sanctions or trade barriers.
- Administrative burden on U.S. agencies to implement and monitor sanctions effectively.
- Legal and ethical considerations regarding the extent of sanctions, particularly on family members.
- Public perception and political implications both domestically and internationally.