Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/667

Bill Overview

Title: Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center Access Improvement Act

Description: This bill authorizes the Indian Health Service (IHS) to purchase certain private land in Hemet, California, at fair market value and then construct a paved road on that land to facilitate access to the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center. The IHS shall maintain the road or enter an agreement with Riverside County, California, to maintain the road.

Sponsors: Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-36]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals who would benefit from the Desert Sage Youth Wellness Center and related residents

Estimated Size: 25000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Student (Hemet, California)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I currently have to rely on public transportation, which is irregular and unreliable. An improved road would make it so much easier to get to the center, especially during bad weather.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Youth Counselor at Desert Sage (Riverside County, California)

Age: 25 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Right now, commuting to work is a hassle due to the poor road conditions. Better access means less commuting stress and more time to focus on helping our youth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

Local business owner (Hemet, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improving access to community resources is always a plus. It might not impact my business directly, but healthier youth contribute to a healthier community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative is a small but meaningful step in improving healthcare equity for Native American youth. It sets a precedent for more infrastructural improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Parent (Hemet, California)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've worried about my kids traveling in rough conditions to get to the center. A paved road would ease those safety concerns significantly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 3

Student at local college (Riverside County, California)

Age: 24 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Volunteering becomes a nightmare because of how long it takes me to get to the center with the current road conditions. I'm all for this new development.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Retired worker (Riverside County, California)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This kind of infrastructure work is overdue. It should set an example for more projects that focus on community access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Part-time worker (Palm Springs, California)

Age: 19 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've only been to the center once when accompanying my cousin. It was a long and tiring trip. Easier access would mean more visits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 8 4

Student (Hemet, California)

Age: 12 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If my friends are going, I want to try it too, but my parents can't always drive me. Better road access might change that.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 3

Community healthcare worker (Riverside County, California)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Every improvement in healthcare access is worth it, even if it doesn’t affect my immediate work at other centers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $4000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $6000000)

Year 2: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Year 3: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Year 5: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Year 10: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Year 100: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Key Considerations