Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6664

Bill Overview

Title: Tennessee Valley Authority Transparency Act of 2022

Description: This bill revises the duties of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Board of Directors to include holding public meetings. The board must provide public notice at least six days before such a meeting, unless the meeting is designated as an emergency. The TVA provides low-cost electricity in seven southeastern states. It also provides flood control, navigation, and land management for the Tennessee River system.

Sponsors: Rep. Burchett, Tim [R-TN-2]

Target Audience

Population: People served by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

Estimated Size: 10000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Engineer (Knoxville, Tennessee)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm optimistic about the TVA's transparency act. It gives us more insight and influence over local decisions, especially the power pricing and environmental impacts.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Environmental Scientist (Chattanooga, Tennessee)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More transparency could help address environmental concerns I've had with the TVA processes.
  • I believe this will ultimately improve community relationships and environmental protections.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Retired Teacher (Florence, Alabama)

Age: 62 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope the transparency leads to better flood control measures that could directly influence my safety during rainy seasons.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

Software Developer (Huntsville, Alabama)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't see how board meetings will affect me much unless rates go down.
  • I'm neutral about this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Small Business Owner (Jackson, Mississippi)

Age: 52 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy should help keep electricity pricing fair with more oversight from the public. This could positively impact my business expenses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Researcher (Louisville, Kentucky)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased transparency might enrich local data available for my research and help me understand the impacts better.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

College Student (Bristol, Tennessee)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't have much interaction with TVA, so public meetings don't concern me directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

TVA Employee (Asheville, North Carolina)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative emphasizes transparency, which is good, but it might add to my workload with more meetings and reporting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Chef (Decatur, Alabama)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious if the meetings will address navigation issues which affect my supply routes.
  • I hope for prompt decision making.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Environmental Activist (Knoxville, Tennessee)

Age: 48 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This increased transparency is a step in the right direction for accountability.
  • I hope it leads to more sustainable policies moving forward.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 8 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 2: $2100000 (Low: $1600000, High: $2600000)

Year 3: $2205000 (Low: $1680000, High: $2730000)

Year 5: $2320000 (Low: $1760000, High: $2880000)

Year 10: $2550000 (Low: $1920000, High: $3150000)

Year 100: $5100000 (Low: $3840000, High: $6300000)

Key Considerations