Bill Overview
Title: EVs for All Act
Description: This bill requires the Department of Energy to provide grants to eligible entities (i.e., public housing agencies, local governments, and certain non-profit organizations) to facilitate electric vehicle sharing services operated at public housing projects.
Sponsors: Rep. Barragan, Nanette Diaz [D-CA-44]
Target Audience
Population: Individuals residing in public housing or dependent on public housing services globally
Estimated Size: 15000000
- Public housing agencies serve low-income families, elderly individuals, and people with disabilities. Therefore, the primary group impacted will be these populations as they reside in public housing projects.
- Electric vehicle sharing services will benefit residents who may not own a car or have limited access to public transportation, increasing their mobility and access to opportunities.
- The act will indirectly benefit employees and operators who manage these EV sharing services, but they are not the primary target population.
- Access to such programs might also benefit local businesses by attracting service users and reducing economic barriers for the residents of public housing.
- Assuming global trends in public housing distribution and population sizes, the affected number will vary greatly across different regions due to the local prevalence of public housing.
Reasoning
- Public housing is home to over 10 million people in the US, many of whom lack private transportation options due to financial constraints.
- Shared electric vehicles can improve access to jobs, education, and healthcare by providing affordable and flexible transportation.
- Due to the cost and logistics, not all public housing areas will see immediate implementation, influencing the varied degree of impact over time.
- Some residents may not need or want this service, experiencing little to no impact, especially if they already have alternative transportation.
- Costs per project area and scaling considerations will affect distribution, thus certain regions will benefit sooner than others based on infrastructure preparedness.
- The allocation of $1 billion in the first year has to cover initial setups, including infrastructure like charging stations, vehicle procurement, and operational establishment.
Simulated Interviews
Teacher (Chicago, IL)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The EV sharing program might be really convenient, especially when the buses run late or aren't on time for my evening classes.
- I'm always worried about my old car breaking down, so this could reduce a lot of stress.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Part-time student (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 23 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 18/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Right now, I rely on the bus, which limits my job options. EV sharing could open doors for better jobs further away.
- It sounds great, but I'm worried about how many vehicles there will be and if there will be a cost.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Retired (Miami, FL)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I've been happy with community shuttles, but they're a bit unreliable. If these EVs work well, I could visit my granddaughter more often.
- Curious about how easy it will be for us seniors to operate the EVs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Customer Service (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's fascinating to think about using an EV whenever; this could save a lot compared to rideshares.
- Safety is my big concern. How does insurance work with EV sharing?
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Barista (Houston, TX)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I bike everywhere, which is okay but tough during summer. EVs could make things easier in hot weather.
- Hope it's not too expensive to use the EVs as I am saving for a car.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Artist (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 57 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 3
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having easy access to a ride would be liberating, even letting me explore gig opportunities around.
- I hope the service remains affordable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 3 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 3 |
High School Student (Newark, NJ)
Age: 18 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 14/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Having a car available when I need one would let me participate in more after-school activities.
- I wonder how good the availability will be, especially when everyone wants it.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 4 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 3 | 3 |
Retired (Cleveland, OH)
Age: 72 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 6.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Could be great if they have EVs with easy access for people like me. I struggle with stepping into higher vehicles.
- Transport has been an issue; more options are welcome.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 4 | 4 |
Unemployed (Seattle, WA)
Age: 35 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 3
Duration of Impact: 8.0 years
Commonness: 13/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Transportation limits have kept me from looking far from home. This program might change that.
- I hope the registration process is straightforward.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 4 | 3 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 3 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 3 |
Factory worker (Detroit, MI)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 15/20
Statement of Opinion:
- A reliable car option would mean I could work later shifts without worrying about how to get home safely.
- I have concerns about how accessible the EV stations will be.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $1000000000 (Low: $900000000, High: $1100000000)
Year 2: $950000000 (Low: $850000000, High: $1050000000)
Year 3: $900000000 (Low: $800000000, High: $1000000000)
Year 5: $850000000 (Low: $750000000, High: $950000000)
Year 10: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)
Year 100: $750000000 (Low: $650000000, High: $850000000)
Key Considerations
- The scalability of the program to different regions, especially areas with lower infrastructure development.
- The reliance on continuous technological improvements in electric vehicle technology to maintain cost-effectiveness.
- Potential resistance from local communities unaccustomed to electric vehicle services.
- Determining the most effective operating models for different public housing scenarios (e.g., urban vs rural settings).
- Ensuring equitable access and usage across diverse public housing populations.