Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6654

Bill Overview

Title: CASC Act

Description: This bill provides statutory authority for the Department of the Interior's National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers. The centers must provide scientific expertise to managers of natural resources, cultural resources, and ecosystem services to inform decisions that aid adaptation to a changing climate and extreme weather events. The program shall include a National Climate Adaptation Science Center and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers. Among its activities, the National Center shall serve as the national office for the regional centers, develop and facilitate coordination among the regional centers, and conduct research on cross-regional and national science priorities. Regional centers shall develop research, education, training, and advisory service priorities regarding the impacts of climate trends and variability on natural and cultural resource management. Interior shall establish an Advisory Committee on Climate and Natural Resource Sciences to advise the National and Regional Climate Adaptation Science Centers on specified matters, including (1) the contents of a national strategy identifying key climate adaptation science priorities to advance the management of natural and cultural resources in the face of climate change; and (2) the integration of equity, particularly for historically underserved communities, in the operation of the National Center and regional centers.

Sponsors: Rep. Grijalva, Raúl M. [D-AZ-3]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals impacted by climate change

Estimated Size: 332000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Fisherman (Florida)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Climate changes have made it tough for fishing. The Act might bring helpful insights into adapting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Environmental Scientist (California)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The Act is crucial for my work and will likely boost our research capabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 5

Farmer (Kansas)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope the Act will provide valuable strategies to manage changing climate impacts on farming.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 6 2
Year 20 5 1

College Professor (North Carolina)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This Act could enrich our curriculum with updated, locally-relevant research.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Louisiana)

Age: 67 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Efforts in better climate understanding are welcome to possibly prevent damage from storms.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Park Ranger (Arizona)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Insights from the Act can assist in managing increased wildfire risks and conservation challenges.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

City Planner (New York)

Age: 53 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Advancements from this Act can tremendously aid in efficient city planning against floods.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Graduate Student (Chicago)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The research from the Act could provide amazing resources for my studies and future work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

Oil Industry Worker (Texas)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I'm skeptical, if this Act helps the state handle extreme weather better, it might be good.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 3

Wildlife Biologist (Alaska)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased support for adaptation science from this Act can greatly aid wildlife conservation and indigenous community plans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $180000000, High: $220000000)

Year 2: $195000000 (Low: $175000000, High: $215000000)

Year 3: $192000000 (Low: $172000000, High: $212000000)

Year 5: $188000000 (Low: $168000000, High: $208000000)

Year 10: $180000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $200000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations