Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6652

Bill Overview

Title: For the relief of Reverend Olusegun Samson Olaoye.

Description: Provides for the relief of Reverend Olusegun Samson Olaoye.

Sponsors: Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]

Target Audience

Population: Reverend Olusegun Samson Olaoye

Estimated Size: 1

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Reverend (Texas)

Age: 53 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am hopeful that the policy will provide clarity and security for my future in the U.S.
  • This relief can help me continue my work in the community without the stress of legal uncertainties.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 4

Community organizer (California)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't know Reverend Olaoye personally, but this type of policy encourages faith in accessible legal relief.
  • It's a small but positive step in supporting those who contribute to our communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Lawyer (New York)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this can set precedents for legal practices, although its direct impact is very limited.
  • I see no personal effect but recognize the broader social and legal implications these have.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Retired teacher (Florida)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I don't know the Reverend, I am happy to see people who serve our communities are getting help.
  • My wellbeing isn't affected much, but seeing community service valued is uplifting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Policy analyst (Washington D.C.)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This individual support policy doesn't change systemic issues but is a step.
  • For those of us analyzing data, it shows a potential shift in how individual cases might be viewed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Journalist (Illinois)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a journalism perspective, it's intriguing to see individual-focused legislative reliefs.
  • While interesting, it doesn’t change my personal circumstances.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Non-profit director (Georgia)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We always hope for more recognition and support like this for community leaders.
  • I don't expect changes to my work but appreciate the gesture.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Farmer (Nebraska)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this fly under the radar for most of us, but I'm glad some focus on individual reliefs.
  • My own life seems unaffected, but there's a positive community aspect.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Student (Ohio)

Age: 18 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.5 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I learned about this policy in a class discussion, and it's inspiring to see tangible help given.
  • It doesn't impact me now, but seeing good outcomes is motivational.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Accountant (Nevada)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • From a financial perspective, this seems like a fair use of resources if it helps an impactful figure.
  • Our church could use similar attention, though not directly affected.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000 (Low: $50000, High: $150000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations