Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6638

Bill Overview

Title: To amend title 38, United States Code, to make certain improvements to the Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill modifies policies and procedures of the Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) related to whistleblower disclosures and whistleblower retaliation, including by authorizing the transfer of VA funds to be made available for the purpose of addressing whistleblower and retaliation claims in specified circumstances.

Sponsors: Rep. Mann, Tracey [R-KS-1]

Target Audience

Population: People served by and working in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Estimated Size: 19400000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

VA Hospital Administrator (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've always prioritized transparency, but the fear of retaliation was real.
  • This policy could encourage more openness and fair handling of issues.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Veteran Benefits Coordinator (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Efficient claim processes benefit us all but more accountability means less stress on staff.
  • I've seen cases where whistleblowers faced unfair treatment, this policy sounds promising.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

VA Medical Doctor (San Antonio, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I've thought about reporting issues, but the potential backlash made me hesitant.
  • If this helps protect people like me, I think it's a step in the right direction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 9 3

Veteran Services Assistant (Miami, FL)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It doesn't directly impact my role but improving accountability is always a good thing.
  • Veterans deserve the best, and a transparent system helps.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Veteran (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I want a better system that ensures veterans get what they're promised.
  • If this policy leads to less hassle at the VA, I'm all for it.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 8 5

VA Nurse (Denver, CO)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Patient care should be about honesty. Less fear around reporting is necessary.
  • I hope protections really do improve under this policy.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Financial Auditor at VA (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If it streamlines operations and strengthens trust, it's positive.
  • The whistleblower aspect isn't my direct concern, but it affects overall integrity of service.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Veteran Support Group Leader (New York, NY)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our veterans deserve the best possible support, and this seems like a move in the right direction.
  • However, effectiveness depends on implementation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

VA Social Worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 51 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It can bring some long-needed change in how complaints are handled.
  • I hope mental health care can improve with better accountability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

Veteran Advocacy Volunteer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Too many stories of blocked transparency. Any move towards fixing that is positive.
  • Past experiences make me cautious about sincere implementation, but optimistic.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)

Year 2: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)

Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)

Year 5: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)

Year 10: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)

Year 100: $16000000 (Low: $11000000, High: $21000000)

Key Considerations