Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6630

Bill Overview

Title: To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the "PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building".

Description: This act designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 N Kraemer Blvd. in Placentia, California, as the PFC Jang Ho Kim Post Office Building.

Sponsors: Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-39]

Target Audience

Population: People using the post office in Placentia, California

Estimated Size: 3000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

retired (Placentia, California)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's a nice honor for PFC Jang Ho Kim, recognizing his service.
  • I don't think it'll change much in my day-to-day use of the post office.
  • Naming it makes it feel a bit more personal, though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

graphic designer (Anaheim, California)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I respect the gesture, but it won't change how or why I use the post office.
  • It's important to remember these honors, but they don't affect my personal wellbeing.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

postal worker (Placentia, California)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I work here every day, and it's good to see recognition tied to the place.
  • It doesn't really change my workload or pay, though it might spark some community pride.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

college student (Placentia, California)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Interesting that a local hero gets this recognition. It's a subtle reminder of our community's history.
  • I doubt it'll affect my wellbeing, but it's a nice little twist to see.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

business owner (Fullerton, California)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The naming doesn't affect my business operations or personal wellness.
  • It's fine as a gesture, but operational efficiency is what really matters for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

retired teacher (Placentia, California)

Age: 67 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a meaningful tribute to a local veteran and a good teaching moment for everyone here.
  • I feel a bit more connected to the community seeing these recognitions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

IT specialist (Brea, California)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think it impacts me much. I'm glad to see local postal facilities named after local heroes.
  • My wellbeing is more tied to my work and personal life.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

journalist (Los Angeles, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a symbolic policy with minimal physical impact but cultural importance.
  • It's unlikely to shift wellbeing scores for anyone except local residents who might feel added communal pride.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

post office manager (Placentia, California)

Age: 62 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Honored to have the facility I manage carry this name, which adds dignity to our workplace.
  • Operationally, everything stays the same, but there's a small boost in morale for staff.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

nurse (Placentia, California)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I appreciate the sentimentality behind renaming buildings to honor people.
  • I don't expect personal change in wellbeing, but it might enhance community security or pride.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000 (Low: $3000, High: $10000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations