Bill Overview
Title: Transatlantic Legislators’ Dialogue Act
Description: This bill establishes a delegation of up to 24 Members of Congress to periodically meet with European Parliament representatives to discuss issues of interest to the United States and the European Union.
Sponsors: Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-16]
Target Audience
Population: People in the United States and European Union impacted by US-EU legislative dialogues
Estimated Size: 330000000
- The bill creates a mechanism for dialogue between American and European legislators.
- It involves 24 Members of Congress as delegates.
- The primary focus is on dialogues pertaining to US-EU relations, impacting policies and mutual interests.
- Both American and European citizens could feel the indirect impacts, especially in terms of any agreements or changes in policies arising from these dialogues.
- European Parliament representatives are involved, indicating an EU level impact.
Reasoning
- The Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue Act is primarily a diplomatic policy aimed at fostering dialogue between US and European legislators.
- The policy has a relatively low direct impact on the general population but could influence legislative and policy directions that might affect people's lives over the long term.
- Given that US-EU dialogues may affect policies related to trade, security, and diplomacy, certain groups such as business owners, policy analysts, and people interested in international relations might express changes in their perceived wellbeing.
- The budgetary impact of $5,000,000 in year 1 is minimal in a broader economic context, suggesting that any direct impact on individuals is likely low.
- Over ten years, with a total budget of $50,000,000, the policy could see gradual impacts as agreements or relationships develop affecting areas like trade tariffs, tax policies, or collaborative projects.
Simulated Interviews
Policy Analyst (New York City, NY)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I believe that fostering dialogue between US and EU legislators is crucial for maintaining strong ties.
- This policy might lead to better-aligned regulations and policies between the US and Europe.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Tech Industry Professional (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- If this policy leads to smoother operations and less red tape for US-based companies operating in the EU, it might benefit people like me.
- However, I am skeptical about how much immediate impact it will have.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Small Business Owner (Houston, TX)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am hopeful that this will make it easier to do business with European companies.
- Better aligned trade rules and lower tariffs could be good for my business.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Graduate Student (Chicago, IL)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy presents an exciting opportunity to study real-time impacts of legislative dialogues.
- It enriches my field of study and could offer career opportunities in diplomacy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Government Official (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The dialogues could streamline processes and help us better align with international standards.
- This is a positive step towards more coherent policy-making across the Atlantic.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
International Relations Lecturer (Miami, FL)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could provide more material and case studies for my courses.
- It's important for the next generation to understand these types of international settings.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 8 |
Environmental Activist (Seattle, WA)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I am concerned whether this dialogue will incorporate discussions on climate change, which is crucial.
- Having constructive dialogues is a step in the right direction if it leads to tangible environmental policy.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Freelance Writer (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More opportunities to cover US-EU dynamics could be beneficial for my work.
- It might lead to new angles and stories, enhancing my career.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
College Student (Austin, TX)
Age: 26 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could have potential impacts as I decide on my future career in international politics.
- It's valuable to see how policies like this unfold and affect international relations.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Nonprofit Worker (Boston, MA)
Age: 33 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Strengthening dialogue through this policy aligns with our mission of improving US-EU relations.
- Seeing these dialogues lead to productive outcomes would be very fulfilling.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $4000000, High: $7000000)
Key Considerations
- The effectiveness of dialogues in influencing substantial policy changes both in the US and EU.
- The relative cost of in-person meetings versus potential virtual alternatives, though face-to-face may be more effective for diplomatic relations.
- Ongoing geopolitical dynamics between the US, EU, and other global powers, which may impact the focus and effectiveness of the dialogues.