Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6617

Bill Overview

Title: Further Additional Extending Government Funding Act

Description: This bill provides continuing FY2022 appropriations for federal agencies and extends several expiring authorities. Specifically, the bill provides continuing FY2022 appropriations to federal agencies through the earlier of March 11, 2022, or the enactment of the applicable appropriations act. It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and prevents a government shutdown that would otherwise occur if the FY2022 appropriations bills have not been enacted when the existing CR expires on February 18, 2022. The CR funds most programs and activities at the FY2021 levels with several exceptions that provide funding flexibility or additional appropriations for various programs. For example, the CR includes provisions that address the President's authority to draw down defense articles and services to respond to unforeseen emergencies, procurement of the Columbia-class submarine, the Department of Defense's response to the contamination of drinking water near the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility in Hawaii, and the Department of the Interior's implementation of enterprise cybersecurity safeguards. In addition, the bill extends several expiring authorities, including the authority for the Department of Health and Human Services to make certain appointments for the National Disaster Medical System, the special assessment under the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015 on nonindigent people or entities convicted of certain criminal offenses (e.g., sexual abuse and trafficking), the temporary scheduling order issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration to place fentanyl-related substances in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, and the current Medicaid federal matching rate (also known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage or FMAP) for certain territories. The bill also exempts the budgetary effects of these extensions from (1) the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO), (2) the Senate PAYGO rule, and (3) certain budget scorekeeping rules.

Sponsors: Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]

Target Audience

Population: People affected by further extending government funding and associated appropriations

Estimated Size: 331000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Federal Employee (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 43 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a federal employee, I am relieved that the funding continues. It means I can keep working and providing for my family without disruption.
  • This policy ensures stability in our work environment which directly impacts my peace of mind.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Environmental Engineer (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is crucial as it allocates funds to the cleanup efforts I am involved in. It's essential for the safety of our community.
  • I'm relieved that our work can continue without funding interruptions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Healthcare Worker (Baton Rouge, LA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Continuity in Medicaid funding is critical for our services. This policy is essential for our patients' wellbeing.
  • It provides some comfort knowing that we can continue offering necessary services.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Defense Contractor (Portsmouth, VA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We are highly dependent on government contracts. Continuation of budget is vital for job security.
  • The policy ensures that our project will proceed without disruption, which is reassuring.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Retired (San Juan, Puerto Rico)

Age: 61 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Maintaining the federal Medicaid rate is crucial as I rely on these services.
  • I'm thankful that this policy will ensure continued access to my healthcare needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 5 5

IT Security Consultant (New York City, NY)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy supports my work in cybersecurity enhancements for federal projects.
  • It's reassuring to know that funding for these important security measures is stable.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Freelance Artist (Denver, CO)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Though not directly relying on federal programs, the general economic stability that uninterrupted government funding provides is important.
  • I believe any policy preventing a shutdown helps all citizens indirectly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Social Worker (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The continuation of funding and legal provisions is crucial in my work supporting vulnerable populations.
  • This policy will allow me to continue assisting clients in desperate need of help without interruption.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Restaurant Owner (Las Vegas, NV)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Continuing government funding helps local economies indirectly by preventing shutdowns that could lead to economic instability.
  • A stable economic environment is crucial for my business, so this policy indirectly benefits me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 5 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Public School Teacher (Chicago, IL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy's continuation of funding means our school can maintain its programs without disruption.
  • It's crucial for educational stability that federal funding remains consistent.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $25000000000 (Low: $24000000000, High: $26000000000)

Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations