Bill Overview
Title: Further Additional Extending Government Funding Act
Description: This bill provides continuing FY2022 appropriations for federal agencies and extends several expiring authorities. Specifically, the bill provides continuing FY2022 appropriations to federal agencies through the earlier of March 11, 2022, or the enactment of the applicable appropriations act. It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and prevents a government shutdown that would otherwise occur if the FY2022 appropriations bills have not been enacted when the existing CR expires on February 18, 2022. The CR funds most programs and activities at the FY2021 levels with several exceptions that provide funding flexibility or additional appropriations for various programs. For example, the CR includes provisions that address the President's authority to draw down defense articles and services to respond to unforeseen emergencies, procurement of the Columbia-class submarine, the Department of Defense's response to the contamination of drinking water near the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility in Hawaii, and the Department of the Interior's implementation of enterprise cybersecurity safeguards. In addition, the bill extends several expiring authorities, including the authority for the Department of Health and Human Services to make certain appointments for the National Disaster Medical System, the special assessment under the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015 on nonindigent people or entities convicted of certain criminal offenses (e.g., sexual abuse and trafficking), the temporary scheduling order issued by the Drug Enforcement Administration to place fentanyl-related substances in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, and the current Medicaid federal matching rate (also known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage or FMAP) for certain territories. The bill also exempts the budgetary effects of these extensions from (1) the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO), (2) the Senate PAYGO rule, and (3) certain budget scorekeeping rules.
Sponsors: Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]
Target Audience
Population: People affected by further extending government funding and associated appropriations
Estimated Size: 331000000
- The CR provides continued funding to federal agencies, which prevents the shutdown of government services that would affect all Americans who rely on these services.
- Government employees who would be furloughed during a shutdown are directly impacted as this bill allows them to continue working and getting paid.
- Recipients of federal programs and contracts that are funded by the government's budget will be impacted as these programs will continue to receive funding and function at FY2021 levels.
- The Bill includes specific focus areas such as defense, cybersecurity, and public health which specifically support military, IT professionals, and health professionals respectively.
- Projects like the procurement of the Columbia-class submarine and cleanup efforts in Hawaii will specifically impact government defense contractors and local populations, respectively.
- Legal and healthcare frameworks related to trafficking, controlled substances, and medicaid programs are directly impacted ensuring continuation of their services.
Reasoning
- The policy ensures the continuation of government services, impacting a wide range of demographic groups and sectors.
- The financial scope of $25 billion over one year is widely spread across many federal activities, implying that individual impacts might be small but collective resilience could be significant.
- The population most directly affected includes government employees, defense contractors, and recipients of federal programs who rely on sustained funding.
- Impacts on personal wellbeing will vary depending on the direct reliance on continued government operations and services.
Simulated Interviews
Federal Employee (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 43 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a federal employee, I am relieved that the funding continues. It means I can keep working and providing for my family without disruption.
- This policy ensures stability in our work environment which directly impacts my peace of mind.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 5 |
Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Environmental Engineer (Honolulu, HI)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy is crucial as it allocates funds to the cleanup efforts I am involved in. It's essential for the safety of our community.
- I'm relieved that our work can continue without funding interruptions.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Healthcare Worker (Baton Rouge, LA)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continuity in Medicaid funding is critical for our services. This policy is essential for our patients' wellbeing.
- It provides some comfort knowing that we can continue offering necessary services.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 4 |
Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
Year 5 | 5 | 4 |
Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Defense Contractor (Portsmouth, VA)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- We are highly dependent on government contracts. Continuation of budget is vital for job security.
- The policy ensures that our project will proceed without disruption, which is reassuring.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 5 | 5 |
Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
Retired (San Juan, Puerto Rico)
Age: 61 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Maintaining the federal Medicaid rate is crucial as I rely on these services.
- I'm thankful that this policy will ensure continued access to my healthcare needs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
Year 20 | 5 | 5 |
IT Security Consultant (New York City, NY)
Age: 26 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy supports my work in cybersecurity enhancements for federal projects.
- It's reassuring to know that funding for these important security measures is stable.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Freelance Artist (Denver, CO)
Age: 32 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Though not directly relying on federal programs, the general economic stability that uninterrupted government funding provides is important.
- I believe any policy preventing a shutdown helps all citizens indirectly.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Social Worker (Austin, TX)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 4.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The continuation of funding and legal provisions is crucial in my work supporting vulnerable populations.
- This policy will allow me to continue assisting clients in desperate need of help without interruption.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Restaurant Owner (Las Vegas, NV)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 1.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Continuing government funding helps local economies indirectly by preventing shutdowns that could lead to economic instability.
- A stable economic environment is crucial for my business, so this policy indirectly benefits me.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
Year 2 | 5 | 4 |
Year 3 | 5 | 4 |
Year 5 | 5 | 4 |
Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Public School Teacher (Chicago, IL)
Age: 55 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy's continuation of funding means our school can maintain its programs without disruption.
- It's crucial for educational stability that federal funding remains consistent.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $25000000000 (Low: $24000000000, High: $26000000000)
Year 2: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 3: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The bill provides crucial funding to prevent a government shutdown, an event with significant economic and social implications.
- Defense and cybersecurity provisions need to be evaluated for compliance with security needs and budget limits.
- Public health funding through Medicaid extensions is crucial for certain territories, which may face cutbacks otherwise.
- Pay-As-You-Go exemptions mean careful consideration of other fiscal balances is required eventually.