Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6591

Bill Overview

Title: PIPES Act

Description: This bill requires the Environmental Protection Agency to establish standards for flushable wipes and require wipes that are marketed as being flushable to comply with those standards. The bill provides for civil penalties for noncompliance.

Sponsors: Rep. McClain, Lisa C. [R-MI-10]

Target Audience

Population: People using flushable wipes and affected by infrastructural standards

Estimated Size: 300000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Nurse (New York City, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The flushable wipes are essential for caregiving; changes might make my job harder if they become less available or more expensive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Plumber (Houston, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fewer blockages would mean better service and fewer emergency calls related to wipes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Product Manager for Consumer Goods Manufacturer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will increase our production costs and force us to innovate to meet standards, but that's good for the environment in the long term.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

Farmer (Rural Iowa)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy doesn't affect me directly, as we rarely use such products.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired Teacher (Miami, FL)

Age: 61 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am concerned that the new standards will make these products less available or more expensive.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Environmental Activist (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is a positive step toward reducing pollution and protecting infrastructure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 9 4

City Sanitation Official (Chicago, IL)

Age: 48 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The regulations would mean cleaner sewers, less blockage, and lower maintenance costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 9 5
Year 5 9 4
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 8 4

College Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 20 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reduced plumbing issues would make dorm life smoother.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Public School Teacher (Denver, CO)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Balancing cost and environmental benefits is challenging, especially on a teacher's salary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Retired Sewer System Engineer (Boston, MA)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Stricter standards on flushable wipes will greatly help reduce burden on sewer systems.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 4

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $70000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $90000000)

Year 3: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $70000000)

Year 5: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $70000000)

Year 10: $30000000 (Low: $20000000, High: $50000000)

Year 100: $10000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $20000000)

Key Considerations