Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6555

Bill Overview

Title: DEMAND Act of 2022

Description: This bill directs the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to designate breast pumps and certain lactation supplies as eligible for financial assistance under major disaster relief provisions.

Sponsors: Rep. Underwood, Lauren [D-IL-14]

Target Audience

Population: Breastfeeding individuals impacted by natural disasters

Estimated Size: 60000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Registered Nurse (Florida)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a mother, I'm always worried about hurricanes cutting off my access to essential supplies like breast pumps.
  • This policy would lessen one of the many stressors during hurricane season for us mothers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

School Teacher (California)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I worry about losing power during fires; having access to lactation supplies would certainly alleviate my concerns.
  • This policy puts breastfeeding mothers like me at ease, knowing we're considered in disaster plans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 4

Stay-at-home Mom (Texas)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this policy is overdue; access to lactation supplies is often overlooked in disaster relief.
  • It will definitely help families like mine who have been affected by storms and power outages.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 4
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

Emergency Planner (New York)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I see this policy as a smart and humane move; breastfeeding mothers need reassurance that their specific needs are met during disasters.
  • It provides a structured way for us to consider lactation supplies in planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 5 5

University Professor (Alabama)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy gives me a bit more peace of mind during severe weather seasons.
  • It's good to know that someone is thinking about these specific needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Small Business Owner (Mississippi)

Age: 25 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Frequently troubled by flooding, having access to breast pumps is crucial for me.
  • The thought alone eases some of the chaos during these times.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

Paramedic (Louisiana)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being a paramedic during hurricanes is stressful enough, this policy helps remove stress from my personal life.
  • Support for lactating mothers is crucial during emergencies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

Homemaker (Nebraska)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think the policy comes a little late for me, but it's definitely a good step.
  • Mothers in my community will appreciate such an initiative.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 4 4

Student (Puerto Rico)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Relief during our frequent hurricanes is an absolute necessity; having lactation supplies on hand eases a lot of my burdens.
  • This policy aids in easing a very real difficulty during natural disasters.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 5 4
Year 10 4 4
Year 20 3 3

Community Organizer (North Carolina)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I won't benefit directly, I see its value for my community and am supportive of this policy.
  • This addresses a critical need that is often overlooked during disasters.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $3000000)

Year 2: $2100000 (Low: $1600000, High: $3150000)

Year 3: $2205000 (Low: $1690000, High: $3307500)

Year 5: $2315250 (Low: $1784500, High: $3472875)

Year 10: $2550840 (Low: $1962950, High: $3810815)

Year 100: $6658740 (Low: $4959950, High: $9988110)

Key Considerations