Bill Overview
Title: Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Prevention and Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022
Description: This bill reauthorizes programs to combat human trafficking and addresses related issues. The bill reauthorizes through FY2026 various programs, including (1) Department of State and Department of Justice activities to combat human trafficking internationally; and (2) the Angel Watch Center, a U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement program that notifies foreign countries of the pending arrival of certain convicted sex offenders. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) may carry out a program to prevent the re-exploitation of certain victims of trafficking by helping such individuals reintegrate into society and achieve self-sufficiency. The bill modifies an existing HHS grant program to provide training to school staff and students to recognize and avoid human trafficking, including by (1) renaming the program the Frederick Douglass Human Trafficking Prevention Education Grants program, and (2) modifying the prioritization for awarding such grants. The U.S. Agency for International Development must encourage integration of activities to counter human trafficking into its broader assistance programs. The bill also reauthorizes the U.S. Advisory Council on Human Trafficking through FY2031.
Sponsors: Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4]
Target Audience
Population: People affected by human trafficking
Estimated Size: 1990000
- Human trafficking is a global issue, affecting millions of people worldwide across various regions and demographics.
- The bill focuses on combating human trafficking and the prevention and protection of victims, indicating the primary population impacted is human trafficking victims.
- The bill includes international programs, thus affecting people globally, as well as those at risk of becoming trafficking victims.
- Training programs for school staff and students suggest an impact on educational communities globally.
- Additional international aid efforts can impact countries where human trafficking is prevalently addressed by U.S. programs.
Reasoning
- The target population includes victims of human trafficking and those at risk, who will directly benefit from policy initiatives aimed at preventing trafficking, providing education, and reintegration support.
- Given the policy's financial limitations, its impact might be concentrated on highly vulnerable communities known to have prevalent trafficking issues.
- The policy also impacts law enforcement and educational communities, indirectly improving societal awareness and capabilities to combat trafficking.
- While the direct beneficiaries (i.e., trafficking victims) may measure in the thousands or fewer due to the limited budget, the broader societal impact includes increased safety and prevention, affecting potentially millions.
- Public awareness and education programs in schools could significantly shift long-term wellbeing by reducing vulnerability to trafficking among young people.
Simulated Interviews
Social worker (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this policy is crucial for supporting victims on their path to recovery.
- The training programs are vital for prevention and can help our community become more aware.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Police officer (Houston, TX)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The reauthorization is essential for our operations to continue.
- Improved coordination and funding helps us be more effective in preventing trafficking.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Teacher (New York, NY)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Training for educators is a step in the right direction.
- With better resources, we can protect our students more effectively.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
NGO Director (Denver, CO)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 2/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy funding is vital for sustaining our organization.
- Collaboration with federal programs ensures a structured approach to helping victims.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Student (Miami, FL)
Age: 19 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The workshops make me feel more informed and safer.
- Knowing what signs to look for helps me and my friends.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
Public Health Official (Chicago, IL)
Age: 31 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Increased resources mean we can target more at-risk communities.
- It's important to integrate these policies into public health strategies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Nonprofit Consultant (Atlanta, GA)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's encouraging to see continuous government support.
- The policy allows for strategic planning and long-term impact assessment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
College Student (Seattle, WA)
Age: 22 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Learning about these programs motivates me to work in advocacy.
- It's clear that policy support is needed for effective anti-trafficking work.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Government Official (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Reauthorization enhances existing efforts and allows scaling.
- It's crucial to maintain momentum in anti-trafficking efforts with consistent policies.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Survivor Advocate (Phoenix, AZ)
Age: 25 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 1/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Government support was crucial in my journey to recovery and self-sufficiency.
- This policy can help countless others regain their freedom and peace.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $75000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $100000000)
Year 2: $77000000 (Low: $52000000, High: $102000000)
Year 3: $79000000 (Low: $54000000, High: $104000000)
Year 5: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)
Key Considerations
- The need for comprehensive funding across multiple federal departments to execute various anti-trafficking measures effectively.
- Reintegration services for trafficking victims could present significant initial costs but result in reduced societal costs long-term.
- The international scope of U.S.-led programs necessitates ongoing partnerships and funding commitments.