Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6546

Bill Overview

Title: Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires the Department of Transportation to establish the Wireless Electric Vehicle Charging Grant Program to award grants on a competitive basis for projects to construct, install, or improve existing wireless charging infrastructure and technology for electric vehicles.

Sponsors: Rep. Lawrence, Brenda L. [D-MI-14]

Target Audience

Population: Electric vehicle owners, potential electric vehicle buyers, and entities involved in the electric vehicle ecosystem

Estimated Size: 5000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm really excited about the prospect of more wireless charging options.
  • Living in an apartment makes it hard to charge overnight, so public options are key for me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Construction Manager (Austin, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm on the fence about buying an EV; more charging options would definitely tip the scales.
  • My area is expanding and I hope this program helps keep up with the infrastructure needs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Urban Planner (New York, NY)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased wireless charging is great for urban planning and reduces barriers to public EV adoption.
  • This can transform how cities utilize space and reduce street-level clutter from cables and stations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Electrician (Denver, CO)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program would mean more business opportunities for those like me who install EV infrastructure.
  • I’m not directly benefiting from EV use, but the business potential is significant.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Automotive Engineer (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Wireless charging is a natural evolution for EV tech, and grants like this accelerate industry progress.
  • It's an exciting time to be in the automotive industry with such forward-thinking policies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Real Estate Developer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a developer, city-wide infrastructure improvements help shape more cohesive and appealing urban projects.
  • I'd like to see better integrated technologies with our developments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Barista (Seattle, WA)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 17/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm hopeful that seeing more infrastructure will push people towards more sustainable choices.
  • I'm passionate about sustainability, and these steps are in the right direction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Logistics Manager (Columbus, OH)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Wireless charging options could influence our decisions to convert more of our fleet to electric.
  • It's about reducing hassle and downtime which this infrastructure directly addresses.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Architect (Portland, OR)

Age: 37 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The integration of wireless EV charging could streamline designs for public space usages.
  • I'd like to see more of such tech embedded seamlessly into our environments.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Retired (Miami, FL)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being retired means I drive casually, but EV charging convenience would greatly enhance my experience.
  • Infrastructure improvements are not just for now, but for how I might use them in the decades to come.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $150000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $180000000)

Year 2: $160000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $190000000)

Year 3: $170000000 (Low: $140000000, High: $200000000)

Year 5: $190000000 (Low: $160000000, High: $220000000)

Year 10: $250000000 (Low: $200000000, High: $300000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations