Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6540

Bill Overview

Title: Respecting the Rights of Organ Donor Recipients Act of 2022

Description: This bill prohibits limiting access to organ transplants based on an individual's COVID-19 vaccination status. Specifically, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network may not (1) request an individual's COVID-19 vaccination status when considering whether to place the individual on an organ transplant waitlist, or (2) require the vaccination in order for an individual to receive an organ transplant. This network is a public-private partnership that links organizations (e.g., transplantation centers and laboratories) in the organ donation and transplantation system.

Sponsors: Rep. DesJarlais, Scott [R-TN-4]

Target Audience

Population: People worldwide on organ transplant waitlists or eligible for organ transplants

Estimated Size: 100000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Unemployed (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I was worried about not getting a transplant because of my vaccination status.
  • This law is a relief since it treats people equally regardless of their medical choices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Nurse (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I had worries about my unvaccinated friend on the waitlist being treated differently.
  • Happy that all patients will receive care based on medical need, not vaccination status.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Teacher (Houston, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Some of my friends who needed a transplant were worried about the vaccine requirement.
  • It's good to know that everyone on the list has a fair chance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Software Developer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act gives me confidence that I won't be sidelined same due to health choices.
  • I feared I'd be stuck waiting longer without this law.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Retired (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am indifferent since it doesn't directly affect me, but I see it could help others.
  • Policy reassures fairness for all waitlisted patients.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Business Owner (Miami, FL)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I have mixed feelings; while more equitable access is good, I believe vaccination has its own importance.
  • Balance between equity and public health needs careful consideration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Advocate (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 57 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is crucial for my peace of mind regarding my spouse's chance for a transplant.
  • I feel more hopeful about my spouse's prospects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Accountant (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 41 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My personal health decisions won't impact my chance for a transplant, but I see why it's crucial.
  • Empathy for those whose choices differ, glad policy supports all.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

Research Scientist (Boston, MA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While not directly affected, I think it's critical healthcare is provided equitably.
  • Health must consider broader public health dynamics.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Chef (Seattle, WA)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I used to worry about my vaccine status affecting further treatment.
  • Relieved to know future procedures won’t bring up my vaccination status.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 100: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Key Considerations