Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6536

Bill Overview

Title: Stopping Traffickers and Their Accomplices Act of 2022

Description: This bill requires an abortion provider to notify the National Human Trafficking Hotline if the provider has a reasonable suspicion that the patient is a victim of trafficking. It also requires each abortion provider to complete annual training on how to identify and respond appropriately to individuals who are at risk of or who have experienced trafficking. The bill establishes penalties for violations.

Sponsors: Rep. Budd, Ted [R-NC-13]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals who are victims of human trafficking

Estimated Size: 5000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Abortion Clinic Nurse (New York City, NY)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The training will definitely help us notice signs we might not have before.
  • I think it's good that we're part of the solution, but I worry about additional workload with limited staff.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Human Trafficking Survivor Advocate (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This bill is promising as it potentially offers a lifeline to victims.
  • I'm concerned that not all staff will take the training seriously.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 5

Abortion Provider (Houston, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I agree with the principle, the additional regulation means more expenses with limited reimbursement.
  • There is always fear of inadvertently violating some part of this law.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 6 4

Public Health Researcher (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative could lead to critical data that informs future public health policies.
  • It's a positive step towards integrated health responses to trafficking.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Victim Services Coordinator (Miami, FL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This law can empower us in ways previous policies haven't.
  • I hope it brings more to their attention about the systemic issues in trafficking.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 10 6

College Student (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.5 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think it's important but might not know what to do if faced with a trafficking situation myself.
  • I'm glad there’s more safety measures being enacted.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Abortion Rights Activist (Chicago, IL)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's critical to ensure these policies don't divert from the access to needed health services.
  • Trafficking is an important issue that needs more focused legislative attention.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Legal Expert on Health Regulations (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The legal intricacies of implementation could be burdensome if not managed correctly.
  • Overall, it's beneficial for public health if executed as planned.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Social Work Graduate Student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Training healthcare providers to recognize trafficking signs is a step forward.
  • I'm hopeful this leads to broader systemic changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Public Policy Analyst (Detroit, MI)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It provides an opportunity for really impactful interventions, but must be done carefully to optimize resources.
  • Skeptical about budget allocation efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 2: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 3: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 5: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 10: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 100: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Key Considerations