Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6533

Bill Overview

Title: Regional Clean Energy Innovation Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Energy to establish an Office of Advanced Clean Energy Technologies to advance mid-stage and late-stage innovation, development, demonstration, and commercialization of clean energy technologies to further regional net-zero greenhouse gas emissions pathways.

Sponsors: Rep. Bonamici, Suzanne [D-OR-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals reliant on or affected by energy infrastructure, carbon emissions, and environmental health

Estimated Size: 330000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Petrochemical Engineer (Houston, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad the government is investing in clean energy, but I'm worried about my job security.
  • If the transition affects my company, it could mean layoffs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 5 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Renewable Energy Consultant (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy is an excellent step forward and will boost my work.
  • I'm optimistic about more policies like this promoting sustainable growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 10 7
Year 20 10 7

Solar Technician (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative will bring more projects and job security.
  • I'm thrilled about the prospects of clean energy becoming more mainstream.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Coal Miner (Charleston, WV)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this worry me because they speed up the decline of coal without offering immediate alternatives for people like me.
  • I hope there are plans to reskill older workers, but I'm skeptical.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 5
Year 2 4 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 4

Environmental Scientist (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a good step for long-term environmental quality and I'm excited about the data that will emerge from these projects.
  • The policy promotes regional changes that positively impact the health of communities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 10 7

Mechanical Engineering Student (Detroit, MI)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Such policies make me hopeful that more opportunities will be available when I graduate.
  • They show a commitment to a sustainable future, which is important for my generation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Small Business Owner (Baton Rouge, LA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I support clean energy measures but hope small businesses aren't disproportionately burdened.
  • The region needs sustainable solutions that include local businesses in their plans.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Tech Startup Founder (Portland, OR)

Age: 30 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Policies like this align with our mission and provide great opportunities for startups to collaborate with the government.
  • I'm excited about potential partnerships and innovation this could spur.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

City Planner (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy complements our urban development goals and is great news for developing sustainable communities.
  • The department's initiative could significantly boost regional planning capabilities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Wind Farm Technician (Denver, CO)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy strengthening clean energy tech is crucial for my job and encourages more exploration into long-term solutions.
  • I support this fully as it sustains my field and opens more doors for growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 10 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 2: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 3: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 5: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 10: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Year 100: $800000000 (Low: $700000000, High: $900000000)

Key Considerations