Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6483

Bill Overview

Title: Improved Transparency of Foreign Drug Manufacturing Act of 2022

Description: This bill modifies requirements for certain foreign establishments that manufacture drugs (including active pharmaceutical ingredients) to register with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Under this bill, if an establishment outside of the United States manufactures (or otherwise processes or prepares) a drug to be imported (or offered for import) into the United States, the establishment must comply with the registration requirements even if the drug undergoes further manufacturing at another non-U.S. establishment prior to importation into the United States. A non-U.S. manufacturing establishment must also file with the FDA a list of drugs manufactured by the establishment. For each drug on the list, the establishment must (1) identify every other known establishment where additional manufacturing is performed, and (2) notify each foreign establishment involved of the listing of the drug and the obligation to register with the FDA. The bill also requires each registered non-U.S. manufacturing establishment to report every three months to the FDA a list of each drug it manufactures for commercial distribution, where currently this report is required once a year.

Sponsors: Rep. Eshoo, Anna G. [D-CA-18]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals worldwide relying on pharmaceuticals imported into the United States

Estimated Size: 200000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Pharmacist (New York, NY)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm concerned about potential delays in drug availability.
  • Increased transparency is good, but it might mean more bureaucratic work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 6 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 6

Software Engineer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As long as my family's medications are secure, I think the policy is positive.
  • I believe transparency is key to safety in healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 7 8
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired (Tampa, FL)

Age: 69 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried that the prices of my medications might go up.
  • I would appreciate knowing more about where my medicines are made.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Primary Care Physician (Chicago, IL)

Age: 58 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy might help prevent shortages by ensuring we know how drugs are being sourced.
  • I support it if it increases safety and maintains supply.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Graduate Student (Austin, TX)

Age: 24 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried any added costs will eventually reach consumers like me.
  • The changes could be beneficial if they improve drug safety.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Healthcare Policy Analyst (Seattle, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The transparency will benefit long-term data accuracy and patient safety.
  • Initial implementation may disrupt pharmaceuticals temporarily.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 6

Manufacturing Plant Worker (Detroit, MI)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I fear that tighter rules might affect my job indirectly if supply chains tighten.
  • In the long run, stricter quality control might benefit us all.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Student (Miami, FL)

Age: 19 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important that the medications remain safe, so transparency is good.
  • I hope prices don't increase due to these changes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Retired Nurse (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Getting more information on medications is a move in the right direction.
  • Concern about whether this will introduce medication shortages or price hikes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Logistics Manager (Houston, TX)

Age: 36 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 4.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • With the right execution, this could streamline trust in imported drugs.
  • The policy may initially affect timelines negatively.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $200000000 (Low: $150000000, High: $250000000)

Year 2: $180000000 (Low: $140000000, High: $220000000)

Year 3: $170000000 (Low: $130000000, High: $210000000)

Year 5: $160000000 (Low: $120000000, High: $200000000)

Year 10: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $190000000)

Year 100: $150000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $190000000)

Key Considerations