Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6437

Bill Overview

Title: Heating and Cooling Relief Act

Description: This bill provides additional energy assistance to households, including heating and cooling assistance. Specifically, the bill reauthorizes through FY2031 and revises the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. Under the existing program, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) may award grants to states for assisting low-income households that pay a high proportion of their income for home energy. To be eligible under the existing program, households must have incomes which do not exceed the greater of an amount equal to 150% of the poverty level for their state or an amount equal to 60% of the state median income. The bill expands eligibility to households with incomes which do not exceed the greater of an amount equal to 250% of the poverty line as defined in the Community Services Block Grant Act or an amount equal to 80% of the state median income. In addition, the bill expands eligibility to households with a monthly energy burden of 3% or more per year. It also requires states to establish procedures to protect households receiving assistance under the program from energy shutoffs and certain late fees. In addition, the bill requires HHS and the Department of Energy to jointly carry out a program that awards grants to states and local governments for developing and implementing interagency plans to reduce energy burdens for eligible households with high home energy use. The plans must promote the reduction of energy from fossil fuels.

Sponsors: Rep. Bowman, Jamaal [D-NY-16]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals living in low-income households facing high energy costs

Estimated Size: 50000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Single mother, part-time retail employee (Detroit, MI)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy provides some needed relief as energy costs have been a big worry during winter months.
  • Not having to worry about shutoffs will let me allocate money for other essentials like groceries.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 3

Construction worker (Raleigh, NC)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's been a struggle to keep up with electricity bills, especially during summer.
  • This policy would definitely ease our monthly budget.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 6 4

Retired (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 70 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I live on a fixed income and energy bills are my biggest expense after medication.
  • Policy support would be very helpful, especially in the summer.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 2

Freelance artist (New York, NY)

Age: 26 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Energy bills are not my primary concern, rent is the biggest issue.
  • I'm unlikely to benefit directly, but programs targeting such assistance are positive overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 5 5
Year 20 5 5

IT Consultant (Dallas, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My home is energy efficient, and I don’t face energy bill pressures.
  • It's great policy support for those who need it, but doesn't impact me directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Part-time janitor (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Every winter is a fight to stay warm while managing my other expenses.
  • The relief will be immensely beneficial, allowing more room for essentials.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 3
Year 2 6 3
Year 3 6 2
Year 5 7 2
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 6 1

Restaurant owner (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My business expenses overshadow home energy costs.
  • Good for families under state assistance but won't change my situation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Teacher (Birmingham, AL)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our heating bills are quite high relative to income.
  • The additional support could definitely help balance our budgeting.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

College student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • My parents cover most costs, energy is included in the dorm fees so I don't feel direct pressure from energy costs.
  • The initiative is helpful for others but won't affect my wellbeing directly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Nurse (Miami, FL)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The summer cooling bill is a major worry given the hot climate.
  • Support would provide significant relief, reducing stress.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3200000000 (Low: $3000000000, High: $3500000000)

Year 2: $3300000000 (Low: $3100000000, High: $3600000000)

Year 3: $3400000000 (Low: $3200000000, High: $3700000000)

Year 5: $3600000000 (Low: $3400000000, High: $3900000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations