Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6392

Bill Overview

Title: No Tax Breaks for Drug Ads Act

Description: This bill prohibits a tax deduction for expenses relating to direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Direct-to-consumer advertising is any dissemination, by or on behalf of a sponsor of a prescription drug product, of an advertisement that is in regard to the drug product and primarily targeted to the general public.

Sponsors: Rep. Slotkin, Elissa [D-MI-8]

Target Audience

Population: People globally exposed to pharmaceutical advertising

Estimated Size: 250000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

marketing specialist (New York, NY)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I generally tune out drug ads, but I know they remind some people to ask their doctors for prescriptions they've seen on TV.
  • If companies advertise less, maybe prices could come down for some drugs I use occasionally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 6

junior high school teacher (Tucson, AZ)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I notice a lot of drug commercials and occasionally ask my doctor about them.
  • I worry if ads stop, doctors might not consider all treatment options.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 7

retired (Des Moines, IA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Limiting drug advertising could mean fewer breakthrough treatments are recognized early by patients.
  • I rely on ads to know which new treatments to explore with my doctor.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

software engineer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Never really noticed those drug ads—I'm more concerned about privacy issues than drug marketing.
  • It's likely that these ads don't influence me, personally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

pharmacist (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 54 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although patients might benefit from awareness, often they request brand-name drugs they cannot afford because of ads.
  • This policy might drive curiosity back to pharmacies and healthcare providers, which could be good.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

graphic designer (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 39 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Ads help people like me stay informed about new treatment options, even though they can be annoying.
  • If people become less informed about treatment options, it could negatively affect health outcomes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 5 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

retired accountant (Miami, FL)

Age: 72 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As a senior, I learn a lot from TV about maintaining health—drug ads are part of that information cycle.
  • Reducing advertising might lead to less accessible information for people like me.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 8 6

insurance agent (Chicago, IL)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm worried about healthcare costs continually rising—maybe cutting back on some advertising will make drugs cheaper.
  • This would be a relief to families who already spend too much on healthcare.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 6

graduate student (Boston, MA)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • As someone studying public health, I see the merits of limiting influence and focusing on what's best for health outcomes rather than advertising profits.
  • This could push for better transparency and honesty in drug promotion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

retired factory worker (Houston, TX)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • TV ads help me keep up with treatments—Sometimes I even ask my doctor about them when they stand out.
  • If policy reduces TV ads, I'll seek more information during medical visits instead.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 5
Year 3 5 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Year 2: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Year 3: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Year 5: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Year 10: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Year 100: $1470000000 (Low: $1260000000, High: $1680000000)

Key Considerations