Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6364

Bill Overview

Title: To amend the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Improvement Act to extend the exception to the closure of certain roads within the Recreation Area for local businesses, and for other purposes.

Description: This bill extends until September 30, 2026, the use of Highway 209, a federally owned road within the boundaries of the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, by certain commercial vehicles that serve local businesses.

Sponsors: Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-8]

Target Audience

Population: People relying on or affected by the accessibility of Highway 209 through Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area

Estimated Size: 95000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Restaurant Owner (East Stroudsburg, PA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If Highway 209 got closed for commercial deliveries, I would face delays and increased costs for supplies.
  • The policy ensures my deliveries are on time, helping maintain my business operations smoothly.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 3

Local Tour Guide (Delaware Water Gap, PA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's important for my tours that access remains quick and easy on Highway 209.
  • The policy keeps my operation efficient, which is crucial for a good visitor experience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Truck Driver (Milford, PA)

Age: 57 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy is beneficial as it secures my route and my job efficiency.
  • Uncertainty would mean frequent rerouting or potentially losing delivery jobs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 5 3

Store Manager (Blairstown, NJ)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's crucial that our supplies arrive on time to maintain stock and service quality.
  • The policy helps support our logistical needs and inventory management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Local Resident (Bushkill, PA)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Keeping Highway 209 open for commercial activities is important for maintaining local job opportunities.
  • While the policy doesn't affect me directly, it supports my community.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Logistics Coordinator (Warren County, NJ)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 13/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy helps in planning efficient operations and avoiding extra costs.
  • Uninterrupted access to Highway 209 is vital for our logistics schedule.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 4
Year 20 7 4

Local Historian (Stroud Township, PA)

Age: 71 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While I don't deliver goods, accessibility is crucial for local tourism and preservation projects.
  • The policy indirectly aids my community's economic stability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Tourist (New Jersey)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I hope this policy means less commercial traffic during peak tourist seasons.
  • My activities mostly center around recreation, but commercial access can affect timing and routes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Small Business Owner (Easton, PA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • More accessible highways can help my business by keeping tourist traffic steady.
  • Though not directly impact, it contributes to overall business sustainability.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Delivery Driver (Mount Pocono, PA)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I rely on consistent routes; blocked access could drastically change my job.
  • The policy supports my job stability and driving efficiency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 4
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 7 3
Year 20 6 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)

Year 2: $2600000 (Low: $2100000, High: $3100000)

Year 3: $2700000 (Low: $2200000, High: $3200000)

Year 5: $2900000 (Low: $2400000, High: $3400000)

Year 10: $3400000 (Low: $2900000, High: $3900000)

Year 100: $7500000 (Low: $7000000, High: $8000000)

Key Considerations