Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6265

Bill Overview

Title: CAPTAGON Act

Description: This bill requires the Department of Defense, the Department of State, the Department of the Treasury, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate federal agencies to report to Congress a strategy to disrupt and dismantle narcotics production and trafficking networks linked to the regime of Bashar al Asad in Syria.

Sponsors: Rep. Hill, J. French [R-AR-2]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals involved in narcotics networks linked to the Assad regime or affected by its disruption

Estimated Size: 2000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Federal Employee - Department of State (Washington D.C.)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe this policy is a crucial step in combating international narcotics trafficking networks, particularly those funding oppressive regimes.
  • The success of this policy hinges on international cooperation and precise intelligence work.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Software Engineer - Defense Contractor (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Indirectly, this policy may offer more work in developing digital tools for intelligence collection.
  • While my work isn't directly affected by overseas policies, broader security initiatives often translate to more projects for our team.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

High School Teacher (New York, NY)

Age: 51 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I use current events like the CAPTAGON Act to help students understand global issues and US foreign policy initiatives.
  • Increased efforts to curb narcotics trafficking are necessary, though their implications for on-the-ground realities should be examined critically.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Journalist (Austin, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This act provides a narrative focusing on drug trafficking within the international geopolitical sphere, which is significant for global public awareness.
  • Policies like these can shift the dynamics in drug trade, though their efficacy depends on execution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Drug Rehabilitation Counselor (Miami, FL)

Age: 46 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The reduction in narcotics could potentially decrease local availability, positively impacting recovery chances.
  • However, the switch to alternative substances when supply is disrupted is a concern.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

International Relations Graduate Student (Salt Lake City, UT)

Age: 25 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 9

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The CAPTAGON Act offers a practical case study for international relations and policy enforcement discussions in class.
  • Understanding the implications of such policies is crucial for future diplomats and policy makers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 9
Year 2 9 9
Year 3 9 9
Year 5 9 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Logistics Coordinator - International Shipping (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • International policies like CAPTAGON could potentially affect global shipping routes and customs protocols, impacting my job.
  • Efficiency in shipping often depends on stable international relations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Military Officer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I view this type of policy as essential to national and international security efforts, drawing on my experience with counter-drug strategies.
  • However, the impact is contingent upon comprehensive inter-agency collaboration.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

University Student - Political Science (Columbus, OH)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The CAPTAGON Act is a breakthrough for policy students not only to learn theory but see practice in real time.
  • Such policies help us analyze the effectiveness and parameters of international cooperation and market disruption.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Non-Profit Director - International Aid (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While drug trafficking networks are a scourge, the CAPTAGON Act must balance between intervention and respecting sovereignty.
  • The policy could indirectly impact humanitarian operations if geopolitical tensions arise.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Year 2: $105000000 (Low: $85000000, High: $125000000)

Year 3: $110000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $130000000)

Year 5: $120000000 (Low: $100000000, High: $140000000)

Year 10: $-1 (Low: $-1, High: $-1)

Year 100: $-1 (Low: $-1, High: $-1)

Key Considerations