Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6199

Bill Overview

Title: Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park Boundary Revision Act

Description: This bill revises the boundary of the Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park in Missouri. The Department of the Interior may acquire, by donation, the land (including any improvements to the land) owned by the city of Ste. Genevieve, Missouri, and used as the visitor center for the park, as generally identified on the revised map of the park. Upon acquisition of such land, Interior shall revise the boundary of the park to include the acquired land.

Sponsors: Rep. Smith, Jason [R-MO-8]

Target Audience

Population: People affected by Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park boundary revision

Estimated Size: 1000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Owner of a local gift shop (Ste. Genevieve, Missouri)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe including our visitor center in the national park will attract more visitors.
  • I hope it will boost local businesses like mine.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired (Ste. Genevieve, Missouri)

Age: 63 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this is a great step for preserving our local history.
  • It might encourage more people to take an interest in our heritage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 6

Travel blogger (Columbia, Missouri)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This expansion might make Ste. Genevieve a more exciting destination for tourists.
  • I'm interested to see how it will change the park experience.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 8

High school history teacher (St. Louis, Missouri)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I might bring students to visit the expanded park.
  • It presents a nice learning opportunity close to home.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Environmental consultant (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 41 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm glad to see this step towards better conservation.
  • I hope it encourages other parks to consider expansion.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Photographer (Kansas City, Missouri)

Age: 29 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This might enhance the scenic potential of Ste. Genevieve for photography.
  • I look forward to exploring the new map area.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Travel agency owner (New York, New York)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While it's a minor change, it's a potential new highlight for Midwest tours.
  • Our clients do appreciate national heritage sites.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

College student (Ste. Genevieve, Missouri)

Age: 22 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This might mean more summer job opportunities and permanent roles in the future.
  • I'm excited about the park's growth and its inclusivity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Mayor (Ste. Genevieve, Missouri)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a pivotal moment for our city, putting us on the national map.
  • I expect increased federal attention and aid.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 6

National Park Enthusiast (Dallas, Texas)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious about the inclusion, though it's distant.
  • National parks are an important collective heritage.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $700000)

Year 2: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 3: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 5: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 10: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Year 100: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $70000)

Key Considerations