Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6102

Bill Overview

Title: Black Lung Benefits Improvement Act of 2022

Description: This bill revises requirements for miners' claims for pneumoconiosis (black lung disease) benefits. Specifically, the bill requires the Department of Labor to pay the attorneys' fees of specified parties on a qualifying benefit claim, give a claimant the opportunity to substantiate a claim for benefits through a pulmonary evaluation, authorize a CT (computerized tomography) scan in diagnosing complicated pneumoconiosis, and develop a strategy to reduce delays in adjudication of black lung disease benefits claims. The bill also establishes criteria that a mining operator must meet to self-insure against claims and increases from $1,000 to $25,000 the daily penalty amount that may be assessed against a mining operator that fails to make black lung benefits payments. The bill authorizes (1) black lung disease clinics to use federal funds to help individuals file claims, and (2) certain previously denied claimants to file a new claim for black lung disease benefits within one year. The bill prohibits a person from (1) knowingly and willfully making a false statement or misrepresentation in increasing or reducing black lung disease benefits, or (2) threatening or misleading a participant in a proceeding regarding such benefits. Further, the bill revises (1) the standards of medical evidence that establish a presumption that a miner is totally disabled by black lung disease, and (2) payments to such miners. Lastly, the bill provides statutory authority for the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.

Sponsors: Rep. Cartwright, Matt [D-PA-8]

Target Audience

Population: People with black lung disease or coal miners potentially affected by it

Estimated Size: 75000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired Coal Miner (West Virginia)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this new bill is long overdue and could really help people like me who are dealing with this illness.
  • The ability to have a CT scan as part of my evaluation is a huge bonus because it seems like a much more accurate method for diagnosis.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 3
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 6 2
Year 20 5 2

Coal Miner (Kentucky)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm not sure if this will impact me much right now, but knowing there's something in place gives me a bit of peace of mind for the future.
  • Stricter penalties for mining operators might mean better working conditions for us.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Public Health Advocate (Pennsylvania)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy marks significant progress towards safer work environments and better health outcomes for miners.
  • Our advocacy work is often met with bureaucratic resistance, but changes like these restore some faith in systemic improvements.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Former Mine Operator (Virginia)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The increased penalties seem steep; it feels like a significant burden on smaller operators.
  • I've seen friends suffer from black lung, so while it's tough on business, it's necessary.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 5 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 3
Year 10 5 3
Year 20 4 3

Respiratory Therapist (Ohio)

Age: 38 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will make a significant difference in how quickly our patients receive the care they need.
  • Better diagnostics lead to better treatment, which is always our goal.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Graduate Student (Illinois)

Age: 29 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This seems like a well-structured policy that addresses a critical health issue with sound approaches.
  • It's gratifying to see courts handling these cases efficiently as it may set a precedent in other areas I study.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired Coal Miner's Spouse (West Virginia)

Age: 58 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • We've faced delays that are unbearable; anything that speeds things up is a blessing.
  • More support in filing claims is a relief since paperwork has been overwhelming.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 3

Coal Miner (Wyoming)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm aware of the risks in my line of work, and knowing that these guidelines exist helps.
  • Increased penalties might translate to better safety equipment.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Environmental Lawyer (California)

Age: 65 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The revisions seem methodical and cater specifically to immediate needs of miners.
  • Success here could translate into broader occupational health reforms across other sectors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 7 7

Coal Mining Equipment Supplier (Montana)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This will probably increase demand for safer equipment, which is good for business but comes with responsibility.
  • We need to innovate to meet these new safety standards, which is a good challenge.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000000 (Low: $40000000, High: $70000000)

Year 2: $60000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $80000000)

Year 3: $65000000 (Low: $55000000, High: $85000000)

Year 5: $70000000 (Low: $60000000, High: $90000000)

Year 10: $80000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $100000000)

Year 100: $100000000 (Low: $80000000, High: $120000000)

Key Considerations