Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/6087

Bill Overview

Title: Improving Access to Workers’ Compensation for Injured Federal Workers Act

Description: of 2022 This bill expands the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in providing services to injured federal workers under the federal workers' compensation program. Specifically, under the program, nurse practitioners and physician assistants acting within the scope of their practice may (1) prescribe or recommend treatment for injured federal workers; (2) certify the nature of an injury and probable extent of disability; (3) provide prescribed treatment for injured federal workers; and (4) participate, with a physician designated by the Department of Labor, in a mandatory workers' compensation examination of an injured worker. In general, only physicians may fulfill these roles under current law.

Sponsors: Rep. Courtney, Joe [D-CT-2]

Target Audience

Population: Injured federal workers

Estimated Size: 2100000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Federal mail carrier (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think having more healthcare providers available can only be a good thing. My wait times might drop, which would really help.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Nurse Practitioner (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy acknowledges our capabilities and gives us the chance to make a larger impact in patient care.
  • I see this as a positive step towards more comprehensive healthcare solutions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Engineer at NASA (Houston, TX)

Age: 42 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 15/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While it won't affect me directly, knowing that colleagues can receive timely care improves workplace vibe.
  • It's reassuring to know the system will work better if I do get injured.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Federal Investigator (Atlanta, GA)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Previously, the medical side of workers' comp was frustrating. This policy seems like it might help.
  • I'm hopeful about quicker treatment transitions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 4

HR Specialist in a federal agency (Chicago, IL)

Age: 39 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Streamlining roles and reducing the physician workload could accelerate claim resolutions.
  • It's a sensible update that balances administrative duties.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Physician Assistant (Denver, CO)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Being more recognized in our roles is going to improve outcomes for patients.
  • This will serve as a model for more inclusive practice laws.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Administrative Assistant at a federal office (Arlington, VA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Faster processing times due to expanded roles should cut down on our workload significantly.
  • I think it's a pragmatic way to improve the process.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 5
Year 20 6 5

Veteran Affairs Rep (Philadelphia, PA)

Age: 47 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If nurse practitioners can alleviate some of these delays, it's a big win.
  • I've seen first-hand how these gaps have hurt recovery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 5

Junior Analyst (Boston, MA)

Age: 33 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 18/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's hard for me to see immediate effects, but I approve greater healthcare access generally.
  • Policies like this set important precedents for other sectors too.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Retired federal worker (San Diego, CA)

Age: 60 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 20/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I wish this was in effect during my years working, but it's good for future workers.
  • Having more treatment options sounds promising.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $20500000 (Low: $15500000, High: $25500000)

Year 3: $21012500 (Low: $16025000, High: $26050000)

Year 5: $22254812 (Low: $17032812, High: $27476812)

Year 10: $24596784 (Low: $18346784, High: $30836784)

Year 100: $-1 (Low: $-1, High: $-1)

Key Considerations