Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/5093

Bill Overview

Title: Wind River Administrative Site Conveyance Act

Description: This bill directs the Forest Service to convey to Skamania County in Washington, upon request of the county, all right, title, and interest of the United States in approximately 23.4 acres of National Forest System land, related infrastructure, and all improvements on the map titled Wind River Administrative Site Conveyance Proposal and dated July 7, 2020. The conveyance shall be made by quitclaim deed; subject to a right-of-way and restrictive easement reservation for the protection of the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail; and completed in accordance with certain Forest Service conveyance requirements, except that certain market value requirements shall not apply. The Forest Service must meet specified disclosure requirements for hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants and shall not otherwise be required to remediate or abate the hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants disclosed. The lands and related infrastructure conveyed must be maintained by the county pursuant to standards established by the Department of the Interior regarding the preservation of historic property.

Sponsors: Rep. Herrera Beutler, Jaime [R-WA-3]

Target Audience

Population: People utilizing or living near Wind River Administrative Site and stakeholders of Skamania County

Estimated Size: 75000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Retired park ranger (Skamania County, WA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I believe the conveyance will improve local management of the land.
  • There is some concern about potential pollution issues, but I'm glad precautions are taken.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Environmental activist (Portland, OR)

Age: 32 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm wary about the policy's potential to lead to environmental degradation.
  • The historical standards for maintenance are reassuring, though.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Small business owner (Skamania County, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy has potential to boost local tourism by revitalizing the administrative site.
  • I hope for better local infrastructure because of new management.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 9 6

County official (Vancouver, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This conveyance is a great opportunity for Skamania County to exercise control over local lands.
  • There's pressure to ensure compliance with historical preservation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Historian (Carson, WA)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm keen to see how the county handles historical aspects of the conveyance.
  • The policy doesn't jeopardize historical standards, which is good.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Teacher (Skamania County, WA)

Age: 40 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy offers a fresh educational opportunity for students.
  • I'm a bit worried about maintenance but optimistic overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 7

Policy analyst (Hood River, OR)

Age: 37 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could set a precedent for county control over federal land.
  • I'm analyzing how this affects cross-border governance.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Graduate student (Seattle, WA)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • An interesting case study for my research.
  • I expect improvements in land management practices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Local business leader (Skamania County, WA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a chance to stimulate economic growth in the county.
  • Proper management is crucial to avoid potential pitfalls.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 9 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 10 8
Year 20 10 8

Retired (Stevenson, WA)

Age: 69 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm pleased the land's history will be preserved.
  • There is hope for increased community involvement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $50000 (Low: $30000, High: $80000)

Year 2: $10000 (Low: $5000, High: $15000)

Year 3: $10000 (Low: $5000, High: $15000)

Year 5: $10000 (Low: $5000, High: $15000)

Year 10: $5000 (Low: $3000, High: $10000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations