Bill Overview
Title: Cane River Creole National Historical Park Boundary Modification Act
Description: This bill modifies the official boundary of the Cane River Creole National Historical Park in Louisiana.
Sponsors: Rep. Johnson, Mike [R-LA-4]
Target Audience
Population: People connected to the Cane River Creole National Historical Park
Estimated Size: 8000
- The Cane River Creole National Historical Park is located in Louisiana, which means local residents and communities near the park are the primary population affected.
- The park is likely of cultural and historical significance, particularly to the Creole community and historians, so those interested in Creole history might be impacted.
- Modifications to park boundaries can affect tourism, so visitors and tourism-related businesses might also be influenced.
- Changes to national park boundaries can affect environmental preservation efforts and wildlife habitats in the region.
Reasoning
- The primary population affected by the Cane River Creole National Historical Park Boundary Modification Act includes residents of Louisiana, particularly those living near the park. These individuals might experience changes in local tourism and potential impacts on their property or community development.
- Historians, particularly those focused on Creole history, may view this modification as a positive step towards preserving cultural heritage, although it will not directly impact their day-to-day wellbeing.
- Tourist-related businesses may expect an uptick in tourism potentially leading to economic benefits, thereby possibly improving local business owners' self-reported wellbeing.
- Environmentalists may view the boundary modifications as crucial for enhancing conservation efforts, indirectly affecting biodiversification and regional conservation wellbeing.
- There can be individuals who are not significantly affected by this act as it primarily concerns a localized geographical boundary change affecting specific communities and interest groups.
Simulated Interviews
Local Business Owner (Natchitoches, Louisiana)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm hopeful that modifying the park's boundary could increase visitor numbers.
- More foot traffic could mean better business for my shop.
- There needs to be careful management to ensure it benefits everyone around here.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Historian (New Orleans, Louisiana)
Age: 62 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a historian, this modification is very interesting and important for cultural preservation.
- It aligns with my professional interest, but personally, my day-to-day life won't change much.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Environmental Scientist (Shreveport, Louisiana)
Age: 29 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Modifying the park boundary is a win for conservation efforts.
- Ensuring the protection of habitats is crucial, and this will likely enhance my work's impact.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Tour Guide (Alexandria, Louisiana)
Age: 52 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could potentially increase the volume of tours.
- If managed well, it could provide more stable, year-round work.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Tourist (Houston, Texas)
Age: 37 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 2.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited by the opportunity to explore more historical grounds.
- It's not going to drastically change my wellbeing, but it'll enhance my experiences there.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Farmer (Florien, Louisiana)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I have mixed feelings. Could mean better conservation but I worry about restrictions on my farming activities.
- Need to see how the changes develop.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 5 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 5 | 6 |
University Student (Baton Rouge, Louisiana)
Age: 24 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- It's encouraging to see more areas being preserved.
- It positively affects my studies and future career prospects in conservation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Retired Teacher (Natchez, Mississippi)
Age: 70 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm supportive of preserving more history and culture, but this change won't directly affect me.
- I might visit more if there's something new to see.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
Travel Blogger (Dallas, Texas)
Age: 31 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 3.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This new development provides content for my blog, but since I work remotely, it mostly provides professional interest.
- More stories and angles to cover when visiting the area.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Retired (Cane River, Louisiana)
Age: 65 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could greatly enhance the area's natural beauty and wildlife protection.
- I am hopeful that it will lead to improved preservation of our rich Creole culture.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2500000 (Low: $2000000, High: $3000000)
Year 2: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 3: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 5: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 100: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Key Considerations
- The key costs will stem from administrative and legal processes associated with boundary modifications.
- Economic benefits will heavily depend on the degree to which the boundary change can enhance the park's attractiveness to tourists.