Bill Overview
Title: Frederick Jobs and Historic Preservation Training Center Land Acquisition Act
Description: This bill authorizes the National Park Service (NPS) to acquire land or interests in land in Frederick County, Maryland, for the Historic Preservation Training Center and related facilities. The NPS may acquire not more than 20 acres in the county to support the physical space, program initiatives, and workforce development capacity of the center. The NPS may acquire land or an interest in land by donation, transfer, exchange, or purchase from a willing seller using donated or appropriated funds.
Sponsors: Rep. Trone, David J. [D-MD-6]
Target Audience
Population: people impacted by the Frederick Jobs and Historic Preservation Training Center Land Acquisition Act
Estimated Size: 70000
- The bill specifically mentions the acquisition of land in Frederick County, Maryland for the Historic Preservation Training Center.
- The National Park Service will be responsible for acquiring the land and handling the logistics of any acquisition.
- The center aims to enhance its physical space, program initiatives, and workforce development capacity.
Reasoning
- The policy primarily impacts individuals in and around Frederick County, Maryland, through increased employment opportunities and enhanced cultural and educational venues.
- Since the land acquisition aims to support workforce development, people involved in construction, historic preservation, and education sectors will likely benefit.
- Residents of Frederick County may see indirect economic benefits from increased activity and commerce due to the policy.
- Some people may remain unaffected if they are not connected to the industry's development or geographic area, maintaining their current wellbeing scores.
- The policy's budget limitations constrain its ability to create large-scale economic shifts, suggesting a moderate impact on specific affected groups.
Simulated Interviews
construction manager (Frederick County, Maryland)
Age: 45 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy seems beneficial as it could bring more construction projects and job opportunities.
- I look forward to new contracts and the possibility of long-term projects sustaining local employment.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
historic preservationist (Washington D.C.)
Age: 27 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 7.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As a historic preservationist, I'm interested in this policy because it increases the demand for professional services in my field.
- It may offer more opportunities to work on fulfilling public restoration projects.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 6 |
small business owner (Baltimore, Maryland)
Age: 34 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 3/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This development could bring more visitors and workers to the area, possibly boosting my business.
- Preserving historic sites is beneficial for community aesthetics and culture, which aligns with my values.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
unemployed (Frederick County, Maryland)
Age: 30 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 4
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I hope this policy increases job openings in the area, making it easier to find work.
- Development might bring new opportunities or training programs I could benefit from.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
retired (Frederick County, Maryland)
Age: 51 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm supportive of the idea to preserve and develop historic sites in our area.
- It might not directly impact my daily life, but enhancing local culture could be satisfying.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
student (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)
Age: 23 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Projects like this one supply excellent learning and career opportunities after graduation.
- I may have the option to engage in real-world applications of my studies if this policy stimulates industry partnerships.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
real estate agent (Annapolis, Maryland)
Age: 38 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The policy could slightly affect local real estate trends, primarily benefiting market interest for properties near the center.
- Increased historic preservation activity could impact demand positively.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 6 | 6 |
teacher (Frederick County, Maryland)
Age: 62 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm excited about the preservation of historic sites, which can support educational initiatives in my curriculum.
- Involvement in such projects can enrich my teaching and offer students unique learning experiences.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
government employee (near Frederick County, Maryland)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I might be involved in administrating aspects of this policy, giving me a professional opportunity to enhance local development.
- Positively impacts regional planning and potentially increases community participation.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
digital nomad (New York City, New York)
Age: 29 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 0.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy doesn't impact me directly, as my work and living situation are entirely remote and digital-focused.
- I hope the historic preservation projects succeed culturally.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 7 | 7 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $20000000)
Year 2: $10000000 (Low: $7500000, High: $15000000)
Year 3: $8000000 (Low: $5000000, High: $12000000)
Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $8000000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $500000, High: $3000000)
Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $3000000)
Key Considerations
- Land prices can fluctuate based on market conditions, affecting purchase costs.
- Potential local opposition or support may influence the speed and efficiency of land acquisition.
- Funding for ongoing operational and programmatic development must be sustained to ensure long-term success for the training center.