Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/3843

Bill Overview

Title: Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act of 2022

Description: 2 This bill modifies and expands the schedule for graduated merger filing fees and requires that such fees be adjusted each year based on the Consumer Price Index. It also (1) requires parties to disclose in their premerger notification filings any subsidy received from a foreign entity of concern, (2) modifies the venue rules for multi-district antitrust litigation, and (3) establishes various reporting requirements.

Sponsors: Rep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals working in or with companies engaging in mergers and acquisitions

Estimated Size: 500000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Corporate Executive (New York, NY)

Age: 52 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy creates additional paperwork, but it ensures transparency in foreign dealings.
  • The new fees might slightly increase costs, but they are a minor percentage of total deal costs.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 8
Year 2 7 9
Year 3 8 9
Year 5 8 9
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 9 9

Antitrust Lawyer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The changes to venue rules could mean more interstate work, which is intellectually stimulating.
  • Increased complexity in filings may lead to more business for my practice.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 10 8

Mergers and Acquisitions Analyst (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 31 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Adjustments linked to the Consumer Price Index require us to forecast better.
  • More detailed reporting could slow down processes but increases transparency.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Compliance Officer (Dallas, TX)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • There will be a lot more documentation checking, which increases workload.
  • Good for ensuring we don’t deal with risky foreign subsidies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 6

Accountant (Seattle, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Fee adjustments add complexity to budgeting but aren't drastically impactful.
  • Subsidy disclosures might complicate audits.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Senior Partner at a Law Firm (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The changes could mean more high-profile cases due to new disclosure requirements.
  • Slightly more bureaucratic hurdles, but overall it’s good for oversight.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Corporate Finance Advisor (Miami, FL)

Age: 33 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New rules might make some clients hesitant about complicated paperwork.
  • Might need to adjust pricing to cover increased advisory time.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Chief Financial Officer (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Annual changes in fees need more financial forecasting.
  • Contribute to better monitoring for foreign interests.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 9 8

Marketing Manager (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy seems irrelevant to my role directly.
  • Policy might affect company at corporate level but not my department.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Regulatory Affairs Specialist (Houston, TX)

Age: 39 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • New subsidy disclosures are critical for us due to foreign investments.
  • Could mean more tight deadlines to comply.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 8 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $3000000 (Low: $2500000, High: $3500000)

Year 2: $3100000 (Low: $2600000, High: $3600000)

Year 3: $3200000 (Low: $2700000, High: $3700000)

Year 5: $3500000 (Low: $3000000, High: $4000000)

Year 10: $4000000 (Low: $3500000, High: $4500000)

Year 100: $10000000 (Low: $9000000, High: $11000000)

Key Considerations