Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/367

Bill Overview

Title: Homeland Security Acquisition Professional Career Program Act

Description: This bill establishes in the Department of Homeland Security an acquisition professional career program to develop a cadre of acquisition professionals. The Management Directorate shall administer the program, including carrying out recruitment efforts and providing specialized acquisition training.

Sponsors: Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals involved or impacted by the DHS acquisition professional program

Estimated Size: 30000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Acquisition Officer at DHS (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I am very excited about the program, as it provides a structured pathway for career development.
  • The training will help me improve my skills and potentially lead to promotions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 9 7
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

DHS Vendor Manager (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The program might improve procurement processes which can lead to more timely contract approvals.
  • Our company could indirectly benefit from smoother interactions with DHS acquisition officers.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Graduate Student in Public Administration (Boston, MA)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program opens up potential career paths for me in the federal government.
  • I would like to apply to this program after finishing my degree.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Logistics Coordinator for Government Contracts (San Antonio, TX)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • While my role isn't directly affected, improved acquisition efficiency could make my job a bit easier.
  • I don't expect major changes but better coordination would be nice.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 6

Policy Analyst (New York, NY)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 1/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Interested in the outcomes of such programs and how they impact federal efficiency overall.
  • While I am not directly affected, I see the potential for system improvement.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Job Seeker in Federal Jobs (Chicago, IL)

Age: 23 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This program could potentially be an opportunity for someone like me who is looking for a foothold in federal acquisition roles.
  • I plan to learn more about how I can apply.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Public Safety Official (Seattle, WA)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Better acquisition processes might help collaboration and efficiency in my joint projects with DHS.
  • It seems more related to procurement but could still have some positive effects.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

IT Consultant for Government Contracts (Houston, TX)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved acquisition training will likely lead to more streamlined processes which could benefit contract dealings.
  • I expect less friction in technological upgrades and purchases.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Retired DHS Officer (Miami, FL)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 0.0 years

Commonness: 2/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think this program is a great opportunity for new entrants and current officers to sharpen their skills.
  • While retired, I believe improved training processes always benefit organizations.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Contract Lawyer (Phoenix, AZ)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved acquisition processes might reduce contractual delays and improve client satisfaction.
  • This program could eventually make some of my work easier as processes improve incrementally.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 2: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 3: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 5: $12000000 (Low: $10000000, High: $15000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations