Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/3228

Bill Overview

Title: National Coastal Resilience Data and Services Act

Description: This bill addresses coastal flooding, including by directing the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to develop a comprehensive suite of products and services with respect to coastal floods, coastal land loss, sea level rise, Great Lakes water level, and vertical land motion data.

Sponsors: Rep. Velazquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]

Target Audience

Population: People living in coastal areas vulnerable to flooding and sea level changes

Estimated Size: 130000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Fisherman (New Orleans, LA)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • If this helps us better plan for flooding, it could save my business.
  • I hope they provide real data we can use—not just for scientists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 8 4
Year 10 9 3
Year 20 9 2

Real Estate Agent (Miami, FL)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Increased data transparency allows clients to make informed housing decisions.
  • Could stabilize property values if risks are managed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 7 1

Retired Engineer (Chicago, IL)

Age: 60 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The Great Lakes can be overlooked in coastal policies, so I welcome this.
  • Better data can lead to better infrastructure planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 2

Environmental Science Student (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 22 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 3/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Advocacy is critical, but grounded in solid data from institutions like NOAA.
  • This could be a catalyst for stronger climate action.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 9 4

Software Developer (Houston, TX)

Age: 38 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Technology should play a bigger role in anticipating disasters.
  • Direct access to flood data could improve our preparedness overall.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 4
Year 3 8 4
Year 5 8 3
Year 10 8 2
Year 20 7 1

Urban Planner (Boston, MA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This could greatly inform my work to design climate-resilient infrastructures.
  • Important to balance economic and environmental priorities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 9 5
Year 10 9 4
Year 20 9 3

Freelance Photographer (Seattle, WA)

Age: 28 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Great opportunity to capture change through my lens with real-time data updates.
  • Could increase public awareness through compelling visuals.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 6 4
Year 10 6 3
Year 20 6 2

Hospitality Manager (Key West, FL)

Age: 42 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 3

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any information on sea level rise helps us prepare better for future hurricanes.
  • Supports much-needed operational planning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 4 3
Year 2 5 3
Year 3 6 2
Year 5 7 2
Year 10 7 1
Year 20 6 1

Navy Officer (Norfolk, VA)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 4

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This can significantly improve base readiness and response times to flooding.
  • Would prefer military-specific insights or data access.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 4
Year 2 6 4
Year 3 6 4
Year 5 7 3
Year 10 7 2
Year 20 8 1

Teacher (Savannah, GA)

Age: 55 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Education is the foundation of change and this can provide real case studies to our students.
  • Necessary first step in long-term sustainability education.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 4
Year 10 8 3
Year 20 8 3

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $35000000 (Low: $30000000, High: $40000000)

Year 2: $55000000 (Low: $50000000, High: $60000000)

Year 3: $75000000 (Low: $70000000, High: $80000000)

Year 5: $95000000 (Low: $90000000, High: $100000000)

Year 10: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations