Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/2626

Bill Overview

Title: Pullman National Historical Park Act

Description: This bill redesignates the Pullman National Monument in Illinois as the Pullman National Historical Park. Specifically, the Pullman National Monument, is abolished and all lands or interests in land that constitute the monument are incorporated in, and shall be considered to be part of, the historical park. Any funds available for purposes of the monument shall be made available for purposes of the historical park.

Sponsors: Rep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2]

Target Audience

Population: individuals interested in or impacted by the redesignation of the Pullman National Monument to Pullman National Historical Park

Estimated Size: 300000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Hotel Manager (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This redesignation could bring more tourists to the area.
  • Our hotel might see increased bookings from tourists visiting the historical park.
  • It's good for local businesses but we may need to accommodate an increased number of visitors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 8 7

Local History Teacher (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 34 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The redesignation will enrich our curriculum and offer students more hands-on learning opportunities.
  • It enhances the educational aspect of the Pullman historical site.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 9 6
Year 20 8 6

Tourism Marketing Specialist (Springfield, Illinois)

Age: 28 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The redesignation gives us fresh content to market.
  • Expect increased tourism demand in the region which is beneficial for the state.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 8 6

Local Business Owner (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 50 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Tourism brings more business, so redesignation could help my restaurant.
  • I hope infrastructure around the park improves as well.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Retired Urban Planner (Evanston, Illinois)

Age: 62 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Redesignation is a victory for historical preservation.
  • The park will maintain the labor history narrative crucial to our community's identity.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 9 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 8 8

University Student (Peoria, Illinois)

Age: 24 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Easier access to a rich historical resource like the Pullman site is valuable for my studies.
  • It may offer internship or research opportunities.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

History Professor (New York City, New York)

Age: 59 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Although geographically distant, the redesignation draws attention to critical sites in American history.
  • This could enrich resources available for my remote teaching modules.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

Tour Guide (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy will likely increase my client base as Pullman becomes a more prominent destination.
  • I hope it also means improved facilities for tourists.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Graduate Student in Urban Studies (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 31 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The new designation could provide a case study for my thesis on historical preservation and urban renewal.
  • It's always exciting to have more well-preserved landmarks.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 6 6
Year 20 6 6

Local Activist (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 27 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The park might bring economic development, but it's crucial to consider how these benefits are shared across communities.
  • I hope this attracts investment in local infrastructure.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 7 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $500000 (Low: $300000, High: $800000)

Year 2: $520000 (Low: $310000, High: $830000)

Year 3: $540800 (Low: $320300, High: $863200)

Year 5: $583634 (Low: $345173, High: $931256)

Year 10: $720440 (Low: $426000, High: $1145180)

Year 100: $6600573 (Low: $3907500, High: $10400572)

Key Considerations