Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/2123

Bill Overview

Title: Diversity and Inclusion Data Accountability and Transparency Act of 2021

Description: This bill requires certain regulated entities to report to the Offices of Women and Minority Inclusion within specified financial agencies. Specifically, entities that are regulated by such agencies and that have at least 100 employees must provide information to the appropriate Office of Women and Minority Inclusion to allow that office to carry out duties relating to diversity policies and practices.

Sponsors: Rep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]

Target Audience

Population: Employees of Medium to Large-Sized Financial Entities Worldwide

Estimated Size: 3000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Financial Analyst (New York)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I think having more diversity is always good, but I am unsure if just reporting data will change much.
  • If the policy encourages my company to adopt better diversity practices, it could improve my work environment substantially.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 9 7

Manager at mid-sized fintech firm (California)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm skeptical that mandatory reporting will change hiring practices fundamentally.
  • In a merit-based system, diversity should happen naturally if barriers are removed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 5 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Software Developer (Illinois)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • It's encouraging to see more focus on diversity; it could make the workplace more inclusive.
  • The policy might push companies to realize biases in their recruitment processes.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 7
Year 20 9 8

Human Resources Director (Texas)

Age: 52 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Reporting requirements are a critical step to holding companies accountable.
  • I believe this could lead to meaningful changes if interpreted correctly by companies.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Compliance Officer (Florida)

Age: 38 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This adds to our workload with uncertain benefit.
  • I hope the policy ultimately benefits the organization's culture.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 8 7

Entry-level Analyst (Colorado)

Age: 27 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 12/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Diversity focus in onboarding made me feel valued.
  • I believe continuous emphasis can enhance my career growth and satisfaction.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 9
Year 20 10 9

Senior Executive (Georgia)

Age: 61 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 2.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Public pressure will drive real change, not policy.
  • Reporting is good for transparency, but I doubt it alone will achieve much.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Diversity Consultant (Massachusetts)

Age: 49 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 11/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The policy can be groundbreaking if companies take it seriously.
  • Real change requires more than just mandating reports; it needs a shift in core values.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 9 8
Year 10 9 8
Year 20 9 8

Bank Teller (Oregon)

Age: 35 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 1.0 years

Commonness: 14/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I don't think this policy will affect my daily work life directly.
  • If it leads to more opportunities, that would be welcomed.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 6 6
Year 3 6 6
Year 5 6 6
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 7 7

IT Specialist (Washington)

Age: 41 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 8.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Diversity and inclusion are critical in all company sectors, including IT.
  • The policy might spark necessary changes in tech.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 9 7

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)

Year 2: $1900000 (Low: $1400000, High: $2400000)

Year 3: $1850000 (Low: $1350000, High: $2350000)

Year 5: $1800000 (Low: $1300000, High: $2300000)

Year 10: $1750000 (Low: $1250000, High: $2250000)

Year 100: $1700000 (Low: $1200000, High: $2200000)

Key Considerations