Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/1931

Bill Overview

Title: Japanese American Confinement Education ActNorman Y. Mineta Japanese American Confinement Education Act

Description: This bill increases the authorization of appropriations for the Japanese American Confinement Sites (JACS) grant program, which supports the preservation of U.S. confinement sites that were used to detain Japanese Americans during World War II (i.e., internment camps). It also establishes a program within JACS to provide grants to Japanese American nonprofits to educate individuals about the historical significance of these events.

Sponsors: Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6]

Target Audience

Population: People interested or involved in Japanese American history and WWII internment education

Estimated Size: 750000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Historian (Los Angeles, CA)

Age: 65 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy helps preserve our historical sites and educates the public about an often overlooked part of American history.
  • Increased funding is critical for maintaining our community's identity and ensuring the mistakes of the past are not repeated.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 9 5
Year 20 8 5

School Teacher (Seattle, WA)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a great initiative to provide more resources for teaching about Japanese American history.
  • It will enhance the curriculum and engage students with interactive learning.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

University Student (New York, NY)

Age: 22 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • I'm curious to learn more about this aspect of history through more accessible educational programs.
  • Expanding resources to study this topic would be beneficial for my academic and personal growth.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 7 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 6 4
Year 20 5 4

Japanese American Cultural Center Director (Denver, CO)

Age: 45 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Receiving grants will be instrumental in sustaining our programs and outreach.
  • It helps us create engaging content for our visitors and spread awareness efficiently.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 6
Year 2 9 6
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 4

Government Official (Washington, D.C.)

Age: 60 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This is a step forward to ensure historical accuracy and preservation.
  • It's important national policy to acknowledge and educate about past injustices.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 6 5

Museum Curator (San Francisco, CA)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Our institution will directly benefit from these grants to enhance educational materials.
  • This policy reinforces our mission to educate the public about this critical history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Nonprofit Leader (Chicago, IL)

Age: 40 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy injects much-needed resources to scale our programs.
  • It allows us to create partnerships and reach a broader audience with improved content.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 5
Year 2 8 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 7 5
Year 10 7 4
Year 20 6 4

Graduate Student (Boston, MA)

Age: 28 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Funding will enhance my research opportunities and access to comprehensive resources.
  • It highlights an important chapter of American history that demands attention.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 6 5
Year 3 6 5
Year 5 6 5
Year 10 5 4
Year 20 5 4

Retired (Honolulu, HI)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 20.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The grants provide essential support to preserve our family history and the broader community narrative.
  • It impacts our sense of identity and justice for our ancestors.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 9 7
Year 2 9 7
Year 3 9 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Local Historian (Portland, OR)

Age: 35 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 15.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This establishes a foundation for further historical explorations and public engagement.
  • It’s crucial for raising awareness about past injustices in the context of American history.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 5
Year 20 6 5

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)

Year 2: $15500000 (Low: $12500000, High: $18500000)

Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $13000000, High: $19000000)

Year 5: $16500000 (Low: $13500000, High: $19500000)

Year 10: $17000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $20000000)

Year 100: $17000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $20000000)

Key Considerations