Bill Overview
Title: Japanese American Confinement Education ActNorman Y. Mineta Japanese American Confinement Education Act
Description: This bill increases the authorization of appropriations for the Japanese American Confinement Sites (JACS) grant program, which supports the preservation of U.S. confinement sites that were used to detain Japanese Americans during World War II (i.e., internment camps). It also establishes a program within JACS to provide grants to Japanese American nonprofits to educate individuals about the historical significance of these events.
Sponsors: Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-6]
Target Audience
Population: People interested or involved in Japanese American history and WWII internment education
Estimated Size: 750000
- The bill focuses on providing grants to preserve sites related to Japanese American internment during WWII.
- Education programs will target awareness about Japanese American history, particularly the internment during WWII.
- The target population includes those with an interest in Japanese American history, such as educators, historians, and students.
- The impacts include Japanese American communities who have a direct historical connection to internment.
- Global educational and historical communities interested in WWII history and civil rights will also be impacted.
Reasoning
- The target population is primarily individuals historically and educationally connected to Japanese American internment during WWII, including descendants, educators, historians, and students.
- Most Americans may not feel a direct impact since this program focuses on a specific historical context, but increased awareness can influence social perceptions.
- The increase in budget suggests significant impacts on educational programs and preservation projects, which will mostly benefit directly engaged individuals or communities.
- Cost restrictions mean selective operations targeting large-scale impacts over the 10-year duration, favoring educational outreach and resource allocation.
Simulated Interviews
Historian (Los Angeles, CA)
Age: 65 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy helps preserve our historical sites and educates the public about an often overlooked part of American history.
- Increased funding is critical for maintaining our community's identity and ensuring the mistakes of the past are not repeated.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
Year 5 | 9 | 6 |
Year 10 | 9 | 5 |
Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
School Teacher (Seattle, WA)
Age: 30 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a great initiative to provide more resources for teaching about Japanese American history.
- It will enhance the curriculum and engage students with interactive learning.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
University Student (New York, NY)
Age: 22 | Gender: other
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I'm curious to learn more about this aspect of history through more accessible educational programs.
- Expanding resources to study this topic would be beneficial for my academic and personal growth.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 7 | 5 |
Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 6 | 4 |
Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Japanese American Cultural Center Director (Denver, CO)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Receiving grants will be instrumental in sustaining our programs and outreach.
- It helps us create engaging content for our visitors and spread awareness efficiently.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 6 |
Year 2 | 9 | 6 |
Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
Year 5 | 8 | 5 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Government Official (Washington, D.C.)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is a step forward to ensure historical accuracy and preservation.
- It's important national policy to acknowledge and educate about past injustices.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
Year 10 | 7 | 6 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Museum Curator (San Francisco, CA)
Age: 50 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Our institution will directly benefit from these grants to enhance educational materials.
- This policy reinforces our mission to educate the public about this critical history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Nonprofit Leader (Chicago, IL)
Age: 40 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy injects much-needed resources to scale our programs.
- It allows us to create partnerships and reach a broader audience with improved content.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 5 |
Year 2 | 8 | 5 |
Year 3 | 8 | 5 |
Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
Year 10 | 7 | 4 |
Year 20 | 6 | 4 |
Graduate Student (Boston, MA)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Funding will enhance my research opportunities and access to comprehensive resources.
- It highlights an important chapter of American history that demands attention.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
Year 3 | 6 | 5 |
Year 5 | 6 | 5 |
Year 10 | 5 | 4 |
Year 20 | 5 | 4 |
Retired (Honolulu, HI)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- The grants provide essential support to preserve our family history and the broader community narrative.
- It impacts our sense of identity and justice for our ancestors.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 9 | 7 |
Year 2 | 9 | 7 |
Year 3 | 9 | 6 |
Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
Year 20 | 7 | 5 |
Local Historian (Portland, OR)
Age: 35 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This establishes a foundation for further historical explorations and public engagement.
- It’s crucial for raising awareness about past injustices in the context of American history.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
---|---|---|
Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
Year 5 | 7 | 6 |
Year 10 | 7 | 5 |
Year 20 | 6 | 5 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $15000000 (Low: $12000000, High: $18000000)
Year 2: $15500000 (Low: $12500000, High: $18500000)
Year 3: $16000000 (Low: $13000000, High: $19000000)
Year 5: $16500000 (Low: $13500000, High: $19500000)
Year 10: $17000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $20000000)
Year 100: $17000000 (Low: $14000000, High: $20000000)
Key Considerations
- Preservation and education about historical sites are important for cultural heritage.
- The program aligns with national values on inclusiveness and teaching civil rights history.
- There is potential for increased tourism in areas with preserved sites.
- Long-term educational impact can expand awareness on minority rights issues.