Bill Overview
Title: Southern Campaign of the Revolution National Heritage Corridor Act of 2021
Description: This bill establishes the Southern Campaign of the Revolution National Heritage Corridor in North Carolina and South Carolina. The University of South Carolina, as the local coordinating entity for the corridor, shall submit a management plan for the corridor.
Sponsors: Rep. Clyburn, James E. [D-SC-6]
Target Audience
Population: Residents and businesses in North Carolina and South Carolina, including history enthusiasts worldwide
Estimated Size: 4000000
- The bill establishes a National Heritage Corridor focused on the Southern Campaign of the American Revolution, which took place in the southern colonies, particularly North Carolina and South Carolina.
- Heritage corridors are usually designated to preserve and promote historical, cultural, and natural resources, leading to increased tourism and education in the region.
- Residents of North Carolina and South Carolina, especially those living near historical sites associated with the Southern Campaign, will see direct impacts.
- Tourists, historians, and researchers interested in Revolutionary War history nationwide and worldwide will also be affected as they now have a recognized area to visit and study.
- Local businesses and economies in North Carolina and South Carolina, especially those in the corridor, are likely to benefit from increased tourism.
- The University of South Carolina, as the coordinating entity, will play a significant role in managing resources and educational programs linked to the corridor, affecting students and faculty.
Reasoning
- The policy focuses on a historical, cultural, and educational development centered around the Southern Campaign of the American Revolution, primarily affecting the regions of North Carolina and South Carolina.
- Those residing in or near the corridor are the primary targets for direct economic and cultural benefits due to anticipated tourism and educational initiatives.
- While the scope benefits local populations, national and international history enthusiasts may see less tangible, cultural value gains.
- The policy might directly impact local businesses, students, educators, historians, and residents through increased opportunities in tourism and historic preservation, leading to small to moderate improvements in their long-term well-being.
Simulated Interviews
Small Business Owner (Charleston, SC)
Age: 45 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 10/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I think this could be great for local businesses like mine if it brings in more tourists.
- I'm cautiously optimistic but concerned about potential changes that could affect traffic or access.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
History Professor (Columbia, SC)
Age: 34 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 8/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This could offer extensive research and teaching opportunities.
- It's an exciting development for our department.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 7 |
Tourism Coordinator (Raleigh, NC)
Age: 29 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- We might see increased interest in local sites and attractions.
- Good potential for job growth in the sector.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 6 |
Retired (Charlotte, NC)
Age: 60 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 6/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This policy could enhance access to and preservation of historical sites.
- I'm excited about the educational programs this could bring.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
College Student (Greenville, SC)
Age: 22 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 5.0 years
Commonness: 7/20
Statement of Opinion:
- More resources and learning experiences are certainly a plus.
- I'm hopeful for more jobs in the tourism sector.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Farmer (Asheville, NC)
Age: 50 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 5
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 11/20
Statement of Opinion:
- As long as it doesn't infringe on farming activities, I'm fine with it.
- Could bring more visitors, which might be good for extra income.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Year 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Year 10 | 8 | 5 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 5 |
Museum Director (Columbia, SC)
Age: 40 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 7
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 5/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This aligns well with our initiatives and could increase our visitor numbers.
- I look forward to more collaborative projects and funding for programs.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 7 |
| Year 3 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 7 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 7 |
Hotel Manager (Wilmington, NC)
Age: 55 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 20.0 years
Commonness: 9/20
Statement of Opinion:
- Potential for more guests is always good.
- I'm hopeful but need to see concrete plans for tourism promotion.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Digital Marketing Specialist (Durham, NC)
Age: 28 | Gender: female
Wellbeing Before Policy: 6
Duration of Impact: 15.0 years
Commonness: 12/20
Statement of Opinion:
- I see this as a great opportunity for marketing and content creation projects.
- It could boost our business if funding supports digital initiatives.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 6 |
| Year 20 | 9 | 6 |
Local Historian (Rural SC)
Age: 70 | Gender: male
Wellbeing Before Policy: 8
Duration of Impact: 10.0 years
Commonness: 4/20
Statement of Opinion:
- This is wonderful news for someone who has spent a lifetime studying this area.
- I'm hoping it leads to further preservation efforts.
Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)
| Year | With Policy | Without Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 2 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 3 | 8 | 8 |
| Year 5 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 10 | 9 | 8 |
| Year 20 | 8 | 8 |
Cost Estimates
Year 1: $2000000 (Low: $1500000, High: $2500000)
Year 2: $1800000 (Low: $1400000, High: $2100000)
Year 3: $1800000 (Low: $1400000, High: $2100000)
Year 5: $1500000 (Low: $1200000, High: $1800000)
Year 10: $1000000 (Low: $800000, High: $1200000)
Year 100: $250000 (Low: $200000, High: $300000)
Key Considerations
- The corridor's success heavily depends on its management and marketing, which will determine tourist inflows.
- Weather-related or geopolitical issues might affect tourism potential in the region.
- Educational collaboration with the University of South Carolina is key to its educational and cultural success.