Policy Impact Analysis - 117/HR/1218

Bill Overview

Title: Data Mapping to Save Moms’ Lives Act

Description: This bill directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to include data on certain maternal health outcomes in its broadband health mapping tool. This is an online platform that allows users to visualize, overlay, and analyze broadband and health data at national, state, and county levels. The FCC must consult with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to determine which maternal health outcomes should be incorporated.

Sponsors: Rep. Butterfield, G. K. [D-NC-1]

Target Audience

Population: Individuals engaged in maternal health, including pregnant individuals

Estimated Size: 25000000

Reasoning

Simulated Interviews

Public Health Official (Atlanta, Georgia)

Age: 30 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 8/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy tool could significantly enhance our ability to address maternal health disparities.
  • The collaboration with the CDC is crucial for accurate data incorporation.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Nurse (Rural Mississippi)

Age: 32 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 5

Duration of Impact: 10.0 years

Commonness: 4/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having accurate data will enable better decision-making for resource allocation.
  • Initial implementation might take time, but the long-term benefits are promising.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 5
Year 2 7 5
Year 3 8 5
Year 5 8 5
Year 10 8 5
Year 20 7 5

Expectant Mother (Seattle, Washington)

Age: 26 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 16/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Any improvement in maternal health information accessibility is welcome.
  • I hope it translates to tangible improvements in healthcare service delivery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 7 7
Year 5 7 7
Year 10 7 7
Year 20 6 6

Family Physician (Houston, Texas)

Age: 55 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Data integration like this can highlight critical areas needing improvement.
  • I see potential, but the challenge lies in effective data utilization.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Health Data Scientist (Boston, Massachusetts)

Age: 40 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 6/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Access to refined datasets will improve predictive modeling in maternal health.
  • We must ensure this tool remains user-friendly for healthcare practitioners.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 8 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Software Developer (Denver, Colorado)

Age: 29 | Gender: other

Wellbeing Before Policy: 8

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This initiative has the potential to create impactful technological innovations.
  • It can enhance the effectiveness of existing health tech solutions.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 8 8
Year 2 8 8
Year 3 8 8
Year 5 8 8
Year 10 8 8
Year 20 8 8

Pregnant Health Educator (Chicago, Illinois)

Age: 34 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 7.0 years

Commonness: 7/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • The integration of data could illuminate systemic barriers impacting maternal health.
  • I hope this leads to enhanced resource distribution.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 8 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 6 6

Healthcare Consultant (New York City, New York)

Age: 45 | Gender: male

Wellbeing Before Policy: 7

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 9/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • This policy paves the way for more informed policy-making in maternal health.
  • Timely implementation is key to realizing its potential.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 7
Year 2 7 7
Year 3 8 7
Year 5 8 7
Year 10 8 7
Year 20 7 7

Maternal Health Advocate (San Francisco, California)

Age: 50 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 5.0 years

Commonness: 5/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Having a clear and detailed data landscape can support our advocacy efforts.
  • This is a step forward in bridging information gaps in maternal health.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 7 6
Year 2 8 6
Year 3 8 6
Year 5 9 6
Year 10 8 6
Year 20 7 6

Registered Dietitian (Miami, Florida)

Age: 36 | Gender: female

Wellbeing Before Policy: 6

Duration of Impact: 3.0 years

Commonness: 10/20

Statement of Opinion:

  • Improved data access helps tailor nutrition programs to specific maternal needs.
  • I am optimistic about the potential improvements in service delivery.

Wellbeing Over Time (With vs Without Policy)

Year With Policy Without Policy
Year 1 6 6
Year 2 7 6
Year 3 7 6
Year 5 7 6
Year 10 7 6
Year 20 7 6

Cost Estimates

Year 1: $20000000 (Low: $15000000, High: $25000000)

Year 2: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 3: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 5: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 10: $5000000 (Low: $3000000, High: $7000000)

Year 100: $0 (Low: $0, High: $0)

Key Considerations